Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Salvage lopinavir-ritonavir therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children
Salvador Resino1, José Maria Bellón, José Tomás Ramos
1Laboratory of Immuno-Molecular Biology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Carlos III, and Abbott Laboratories, Madrid, Spain.
Insights
Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is more effective in controlling viral replication in HIV-infected children compared to other salvage regimens. This combination therapy leads to faster viral load suppression and reduced risk of viral rebound.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Virology
- Immunology
Background:
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in children requires effective salvage therapies.
- Controlling viral replication is crucial for managing pediatric HIV.
- Evaluating different highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of different salvage therapies in controlling viral replication in HIV-infected children.
- To compare the effectiveness of HAART regimens including lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) against other second-line treatments.
- To determine the impact of salvage therapies on viral load suppression and rebound.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational study involving 120 HIV-infected children.
- Children were categorized into three groups based on salvage HAART: first-line HAART, second-line HAART (protease inhibitor-experienced), and second-line HAART with LPV/r.
- Viral load (VL) was quantified using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, with survival analyses for VL < or =400 copies/mL and rebound.
Main Results:
- HAART including LPV/r achieved VL < or =400 copies/mL in 71.5% of children, surpassing first-line (52.4%) and second-line (48.3%) HAART.
- Children on LPV/r-containing HAART reached VL < or =400 copies/mL significantly faster than those on other second-line regimens (P=0.017).
- LPV/r-based HAART demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of viral rebound (32.4%) compared to other salvage therapies, with a 3.29 times lower risk.
Conclusions:
- Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) incorporating lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) offers superior control of HIV replication in children compared to other classic salvage antiretroviral therapies.
- LPV/r-based salvage regimens are associated with improved viral load suppression and reduced risk of virologic failure in pediatric HIV management.
- These findings support the use of LPV/r-containing HAART as an effective salvage strategy for HIV-infected children.
Objective:
To study the control of viral replication in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children on different salvage therapies.
Design And Setting:
A retrospective observational study in 120 HIV-infected children was conducted. The children were divided into 3 groups according to their salvage therapies: (1) children receiving first line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); (2) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving second line HAART; (3) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving HAART including lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r). The outcome variables examined were time to achieve viral load (VL) < or =400 copies/mL, success in achieving VL < or =400 copies/mL and time to virologic failure (VL >400 copies/mL).
Methods:
VL (HIV-RNA copies/mL) was quantified with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction molecular assay. For each protocol, survival analyses were conducted to determine the probability of achieving VL < or =400 copies/mL and rebound of VL.
Results:
VL < or =400 copies/mL was achieved by 52.4% of children receiving first line HAART, 48.3% receiving second line HAART and 71.5% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART including LPV/r reached VL < or =400 copies/mL in a shorter time than children receiving second line HAART (P = 0.017), but quite similar to children receiving first line HAART. In terms of adjusted relative risk, children receiving HAART including LPV/r were 3.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59, 7.07] more likely to achieve VL < or =400 copies/mL than children receiving a different second line HAART. VL rebound occurred in 68.2% children receiving first line HAART, 73.4% receiving second line HAART and 32.4% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART that includes LPV/r has less incidence of VL rebound (P=0.013) and 3.29 (95% CI 1.04, 10.3) times less risk to achieve a VL rebound than children receiving a different second line HAART.
Conclusions:
HAART that includes LPV/r is able to control HIV replication more efficiently than other classic salvage antiretroviral therapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Inhibitors of Virion Maturation and Assembly

