Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sample discrimination of frequency differences with distracters.

Donna L Neff1, Eric C Odgaard

  • 1Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA. neff@boystown.org

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|December 18, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Remote frequency distracters significantly impact auditory perception. Random-frequency distracters severely impair sample discrimination of frequency differences (SD-F), especially when a lower-frequency distracter dominates.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2014
Same author

Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread-of-excitation using Cochlear's dual-electrode mode.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2014
Same author

Performance outcomes for borderline cochlear implant recipients with substantial preoperative residual hearing.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2014
Same author

Masking by a remote-frequency noise band in children and adults.

Ear and hearing·2011
Same author

Confidence intervals for effect sizes: compliance and clinical significance in the Journal of Consulting and clinical Psychology.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2010
Same author

Excitation-based and informational masking of a tonal signal in a four-tone masker.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2010

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Auditory perception relies on distinguishing target sounds from background noise.
  • Frequency discrimination is crucial for understanding speech and music.
  • Remote frequency distracters can interfere with auditory tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the type and frequency range of remote distracters affect sample discrimination of frequency differences (SD-F).
  • To understand the influence of distracter variability and frequency relationships on SD-F performance.

Main Methods:

  • Normal-hearing listeners performed SD-F tasks with target tones near 2000 Hz.
  • Experiment 1: Tested random-frequency tones, fixed-frequency tones, or noise bands as distracters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2: Manipulated distracter levels and presented single distracters; analyzed trial-by-trial responses.
  • Experiment 3: Shifted stimulus frequencies 2 octaves higher.

    • Main Results:

    • Random-frequency distracters significantly degraded SD-F performance, driving it near chance.
    • Fixed-frequency and noise-band distracters had a smaller effect.
    • The lower-frequency distracter exerted a dominant influence, requiring significant attenuation for performance recovery.
    • This dominance persisted even at higher frequencies.

    Conclusions:

    • Stimulus variability and the frequency relationship between targets and distracters are critical factors in SD-F.
    • The auditory system is particularly susceptible to interference from lower-frequency distracters.
    • Understanding these interactions is key for developing effective auditory processing models.