Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Estimating angina prevalence in a managed care population
Carol Zaher1, George A Goldberg, Pam Kadlubek
1Ingenix, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Insights
Estimating angina prevalence using administrative data reveals significant rates, particularly for coronary artery disease (CAD) and chest pain. Managed care data show higher prevalence in men and older adults, contrasting with some other estimates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Angina prevalence estimations are crucial for understanding cardiovascular disease burden.
- Managed care data offers a unique perspective on disease prevalence within specific populations.
- Previous estimates have varied, necessitating further investigation into reliable prevalence metrics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the prevalence of angina pectoris, coronary artery disease (CAD), and chest pain using managed care administrative data.
- To compare these estimates with published data, such as American Heart Association (AHA) figures.
- To project prevalence rates to the broader US population and analyze demographic trends.
Main Methods:
- Utilized managed care administrative data from 2000-2001.
- Applied three distinct definitions for prevalence: angina pectoris diagnosis codes, broader coronary artery disease (CAD) codes, and chest pain diagnosis codes.
- Calculated prevalence rates per 1000 members, comparing results across definitions, years, and demographic groups (gender, age).
Main Results:
- Prevalence rates per 1000 for angina pectoris were 12.3 (2000), 14.0 (2001), and 17.5 (2000-2001).
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) rates were 52.2, 59.9, and 65.4, respectively; chest pain rates were 63.4, 75.8, and 93.4, respectively.
- Rates were consistently higher in men than women and increased with age, consistent with US population projections. Managed care rates for angina pectoris were lower than AHA estimates.
Conclusions:
- Angina prevalence in the US is substantial, with significant numbers identified through managed care data.
- Managed care data suggest higher prevalence in men and older adults, contrary to some AHA findings, possibly due to data capture differences.
- The aging US population is expected to increase the number of angina patients, potentially escalating healthcare costs.
Abstract:
Estimations of angina prevalence were calculated using managed care administrative data and applying 3 angina-related definitions. The definitions comprised angina pectoris diagnosis codes, diagnosis and procedure codes signifying the broader condition of coronary artery disease (CAD), including angina pectoris, and diagnosis codes for the symptom of chest pain. Prevalence rates were calculated in 2000, 2001, and the combined period of 2000 and 2001 for each definition based on the number of members with at least 1 day of eligibility in each period. Results were compared with published estimates and projected to the US population. The prevalence rates per 1000 people for angina pectoris in 2000, 2001, and 2000--2001 were 12.3, 14.0, and 17.5, respectively. The prevalence rate is higher in the combined 2-year period primarily because there is little duplication in patients with angina who appear in both years, but there is significant overlap in the overall (denominator) population eligible in both years. For CAD the rates were 52.2, 59.9, and 65.4, respectively, and for chest pain they were 63.4, 75.8, and 93.4, respectively. Rates were higher in men versus women and in each successive age group. These gender and age results were observed in the projections to the US population. By comparison, the American Heart Association (AHA) estimates angina pectoris prevalence to be 35 per 1000 in 2001. The lower managed care rate for angina pectoris may reflect differences in data capture (ie, self-reported data for AHA vs claims submitted for reimbursement for managed care). AHA estimates are higher for women versus men while the managed care estimates show the opposite trend. Prevalence of angina in the United States is substantial. With the aging of the US population, numbers of patients with angina presenting to the healthcare system can be expected to increase, further adding to the cost burdens facing managed care.
Related Concept Videos
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina IV: Management
Angina I: Introduction
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management