Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Issues of validity in the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

R G Malgady1, L H Rogler, W W Tryon

  • 1Program in Quantitative Studies, New York University, Bronx, NY 10458.

Journal of Psychiatric Research
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) improves psychiatric diagnosis reliability but often lacks criterion-related validity evidence. This study critiques DIS validity claims and proposes a framework for accurate diagnostic validation research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validating a double-press method for computer administration of personality inventory items.

Psychological assessment·2002
Same author

Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.

Psychological methods·2002
Same author

Modal attention asymmetry in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Neuropsychology·2002
Same author

How accurately does wrist actigraphy identify the states of sleep and wakefulness?

Sleep·2002
Same author

The neglect of response bias in mental health research.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2001
Same author

Cultural and linguistic considerations in psychodiagnosis with Hispanics: the need for an empirically informed process model.

Social work·2001

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Psychometrics
  • Clinical Diagnosis

Background:

  • The Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) is a primary tool in psychiatric epidemiology for enhancing diagnostic reliability.
  • Despite its widespread use, many studies on the DIS focus on reliability, neglecting crucial criterion-related validity.
  • Existing literature often misinterprets reliability as evidence of validity for the DIS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the basis of validity claims for the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS).
  • To identify and explain erroneous reasoning in inferring validity from reliability for the DIS.
  • To present a framework for the process of diagnostic validation concerning the DIS.

Main Methods:

  • Review of psychometric principles and standard definitions of validity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing literature on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule's validity and reliability.
  • Conceptual framework development for diagnostic validation.

    • Main Results:

    • Claims of DIS validity are often based on reliability data, not criterion-related validity.
    • Misinterpretations of psychometric terminology lead to persistent, mistaken assertions of DIS validity.
    • A gap exists in research methodologies for establishing criterion-related validity of DIS diagnoses.

    Conclusions:

    • The current understanding and application of validity for the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) require re-evaluation.
    • Distinguishing between reliability and validity is essential for accurate psychometric assessment in psychiatric epidemiology.
    • Further research employing robust validation strategies is necessary to support the clinical utility of DIS-derived diagnoses.