Providing child safety equipment to prevent injuries: randomised controlled trial

Michael Watson1, Denise Kendrick, Carol Coupland

  • 1Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2HA. michael.watson@nottingham.ac.uk

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|December 18, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Providing safety equipment and advice to families with young children in deprived areas improved safety practices but did not reduce medically attended injuries. The intervention

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Injury Prevention
  • Child Safety

Background:

  • Unintentional injuries are a significant concern for children under 5, particularly in deprived areas.
  • Safety advice and equipment are potential interventions to mitigate these risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of safety advice and equipment in reducing unintentional injuries among young children in deprived families.
  • To assess the impact on medically attended injuries and healthcare utilization.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 3428 families with children under 5 in Nottingham.
  • Intervention included standardized safety consultations and free provision/fitting of safety equipment (stair gates, fire guards, smoke alarms, etc.).
  • Primary outcomes measured medically attended injuries, primary/secondary care attendance, and hospital admissions over two years.

Main Results:

  • No significant reduction in medically attended injuries, secondary care attendance, or hospital admissions was observed.
  • A significant increase in primary care attendance for injuries was noted in the intervention group.
  • Families receiving the intervention showed improved safety practices at one and two-year follow-ups, though differences were modest.

Conclusions:

  • The intervention successfully enhanced safety practices in families for up to two years.
  • Despite improved practices, the intervention did not lead to a reduction in injuries requiring medical attention.
  • The magnitude of safety practice changes may have been insufficient to impact overall injury rates.
Abstract