Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Non-invasive Assessments of Subjective and Objective Recovery Characteristics Following an Exhaustive Jump Protocol
Published on: June 8, 2017
The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility
Joseph T Giacino1, Kathleen Kalmar, John Whyte
1JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute and New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, JFK Medical Center, Edison, NJ 08820, USA. jgiacino@solarishs.org
Objective:
To determine the measurement properties and diagnostic utility of the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).
Design:
Analysis of interrater and test-retest reliability, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy.
Setting:
Acute inpatient brain injury rehabilitation hospital.
Participants:
Convenience sample of 80 patients with severe acquired brain injury admitted to an inpatient Coma Intervention Program with a diagnosis of either vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS).
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
The CRS-R, the JFK Coma Recovery Scale (CRS), and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS).
Results:
Interrater and test-retest reliability were high for CRS-R total scores. Subscale analysis showed moderate to high interrater and test-retest agreement although systematic differences in scoring were noted on the visual and oromotor/verbal subscales. CRS-R total scores correlated significantly with total scores on the CRS and DRS indicating acceptable concurrent validity. The CRS-R was able to distinguish 10 patients in an MCS who were otherwise misclassified as in a VS by the DRS.
Conclusions:
The CRS-R can be administered reliably by trained examiners and repeated measurements yield stable estimates of patient status. CRS-R subscale scores demonstrated good agreement across raters and ratings but should be used cautiously because some scores were underrepresented in the current study. The CRS-R appears capable of differentiating patients in an MCS from those in a VS.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

