Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation.

Jennifer A H Bell1, Sylvia Hyland, Tania DePellegrin

  • 1University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. jah.bell@utoronto.ca <jah.bell@utoronto.ca>

BMC Health Services Research
|December 21, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recording Medical Errors in Brain Tumor Surgery Can Facilitate Their Avoidance: Single Institution Comparative Cohort Analysis over 19 Years.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Understanding clinical ethics situations: a co-created repertoire of practices.

BMC medical ethics·2026
Same author

Targeted and Personalized Therapy for Difficult Benign Brain Tumors: A Review.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same author

A practical framework for operationalising responsible and equitable artificial intelligence in health care: tackling bias, inequity, and implementation challenges.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same author

Outpatient Surgery in Neuro-Oncology-Advancing Patient Access and Care.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Assessment of auditory pathway microstructure in vestibular schwannoma patients: a quantitative diffusion tensor tractography study.

Journal of neurosurgery·2025

Hospital priority setting during a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak was evaluated. The study found that while efforts were made to ensure fairness using the

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Public Health Ethics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Hospital priority setting is complex due to funding and patient needs.
  • Outbreaks like Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) exacerbate these challenges.
  • Ethical frameworks are crucial for navigating resource allocation during crises.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and evaluate hospital priority setting during the 2003 SARS outbreak in Toronto.
  • To assess the application of the 'accountability for reasonableness' ethical framework.
  • To identify best practices and areas for improvement in crisis-driven healthcare decisions.

Main Methods:

  • A case study of a large tertiary hospital in Toronto, Canada.
  • Analysis of over 200 key documents (e.g., emails, bulletins).
Keywords:
Empirical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted 35 interviews with key informants and employed modified thematic analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Hospital leadership attempted to implement 'accountability for reasonableness'.
    • Decision-making processes and reasoning were documented.
    • While efforts were made, the decision-making process was not considered ideal, with opportunities for improvement identified.

    Conclusions:

    • 'Accountability for reasonableness' provides a valuable framework for fair hospital priority setting.
    • Fairness in decision-making is paramount during public health crises like SARS.
    • The study highlights the need for robust ethical guidelines in emergency healthcare management.