Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Patient safety--how much is enough?

Rebecca Nunn Warburton1

  • 1School of Public Administration, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, Stn CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2. rnwarbur@uvic.ca

Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
|December 21, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Healthcare error reduction efforts must consider cost-effectiveness. Prioritizing safety improvements by cost-benefit analysis ensures maximum return on investment for patient safety initiatives.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Recommendations from health research for children and adolescents living in the Kimberley region of Western Australia: a scoping review.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care: A systematic review to inform health policy and health system performance.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Basic human values, responsiveness, and dignity in geriatric organizations in Israel: A qualitative study of state regulations.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

A policy analysis of the three-month waiting period for new and returning residents to access provincial health insurance in Ontario, Canada.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Policy priorities in palliative and end-of-life care: An exploration of issues reflected in public strategy.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Advancing stakeholder analysis: Power and participation in health technology assessment policy development in the United Arab Emirates.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare systems engineering
  • Patient safety research
  • Health economics

Background:

  • Increased awareness of healthcare errors has led to significant resource allocation for harm reduction.
  • Current improvement strategies often overlook the costs associated with prevention and prioritize based on study rigor.
  • The proliferation of safety goals risks overwhelming hospital capacity without known cost-effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical need for cost-effectiveness data in healthcare safety improvement.
  • To advocate for prioritizing safety initiatives and research based on economic evaluations.
  • To emphasize maximizing societal return on investment in error reduction.

Main Methods:

  • The study emphasizes the need for collecting cost-effectiveness information on safety improvements.
  • It proposes using an economic evaluation loop for iterative assessment of costs and effects.
  • Targeted original research is recommended where initial estimates show uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • Ignoring cost-effectiveness limits the return on investment for patient safety resources.
  • Safety improvements incur direct and hidden costs, including delays and potential new errors.
  • Near-perfect safety may not always be achievable or cost-effective.

Conclusions:

  • Minimizing total costs of accidents and prevention requires data on both costs and effects of safety improvements.
  • Economic evaluation is essential for prioritizing safety initiatives and research effectively.
  • A systematic approach integrating cost-benefit analysis is crucial for advancing patient safety.

Related Experiment Videos