Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Global orientation aftereffect in multi-attribute displays: implications for the binding problem.

Frédéric J A M Poirier1, Barrie J Frost

  • 1Centre for Vision Research, Neurodynamics and Vision Lab, Computer Science and Engineering Building, Room B0002E, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto (ON), M3J 1P3, Canada. poirier@hpl.cvr.yorku.ca

Vision Research
|December 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence for a southward autumn migration of nocturnal noctuid moths in central Europe.

The Journal of experimental biology·2018
Same author

Head-Eye Coordination Increases with Age and Varies across Countries.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2015
Same author

Reply to Oberhauser et al.: The experimental evidence clearly shows that monarch butterflies are almost certainly not true navigators.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2013
Same author

Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading.

Journal of vision·2013
Same author

An experimental displacement and over 50 years of tag-recoveries show that monarch butterflies are not true navigators.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2013
Same author

Motion parallax processing in pigeon (Columba livia) pretectal neurons.

The European journal of neuroscience·2013
Same journal

Impact of crowding on visual appearance and performance in amblyopia.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

This study on visual binding found that attribute similarity did not affect orientation aftereffects (OAE). Attribute cooperation was moderate, supporting visual segregation models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The visual binding problem explains how distinct object features are integrated into unified percepts.
  • Orientation aftereffect (OAE) paradigms are used to study visual processing and feature integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of attribute similarity in the visual binding mechanism.
  • To determine how different visual attributes (luminance, color, texture, motion) interact during binding.
  • To test whether segregation or integration models better explain visual binding.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an orientation aftereffect (OAE) paradigm with multi-attribute visual displays.
  • Phase-shifted horizontal layers of vertical edges to create a global orientation.
  • Varied attributes defining edges (luminance, color, texture, motion) across layers during adaptation and testing phases.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • OAE magnitude depended solely on adaptation phase attributes, not attribute similarity between adaptation and testing.
  • Attribute similarity between adaptation and testing phases had no significant effect on OAE magnitude.
  • Cooperation between different visual attributes was moderate, less than predicted by strong integration models.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support visual segregation models over integration models for the binding mechanism.
  • The visual system may prioritize segregating attributes rather than fully integrating them for binding.
  • Attribute interactions in binding are complex and influenced by the specific attributes involved.