Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selective phenotyping for increased efficiency in genetic mapping studies.

Chunfang Jin1, Hong Lan, Alan D Attie

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

Genetics
|December 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pancreatic islet α cell function and proliferation require the arginine transporter SLC7A2.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same author

Proinsulin regulators identified with CRISPR screen and in vivo mouse QTL mapping.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Distinct genetic architecture of gene and isoform level QTL in the Diversity Outbred (DO) mouse population.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Restriction of Individual Branched-Chain Amino Acids has Distinct Effects on the Development and Progression of Alzheimer's Disease in 3xTg Mice.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Mammals that can develop type 2 diabetes have a similarly structured β-sheet amyloid oligomer.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

A structural model of toxic amyloid oligomers involved in type 2 diabetes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Selective phenotyping maximizes genotypic dissimilarity to improve genetic mapping power. This cost-effective method enhances sensitivity, especially when phenotyping is challenging, outperforming random sampling.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genetic mapping studies rely on heritability, sample size, and genetic dissimilarity.
  • Costly and time-consuming phenotyping limits sample sizes in genetic studies.
  • Random sampling may require large cohorts to achieve sufficient linkage detection power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce an algorithm for selective phenotyping to enhance genetic mapping sensitivity.
  • To demonstrate improvements in statistical power compared to random sampling for a given sample size.
  • To provide a method that is efficient even when phenotyping is a bottleneck.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an algorithm to select individuals based on genotype data, maximizing genotypic dissimilarity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied selective phenotyping to preferentially choose individuals for analysis.
  • Evaluated the method's effectiveness with and without prior knowledge of genetic architecture.

    • Main Results:

    • Selective phenotyping significantly improves sensitivity over random sampling for the same sample size.
    • The method enhances efficiency, particularly when phenotyping is difficult or expensive.
    • Selective phenotyping maintains mapping efficiency in unselected genomic regions and yields representative population inferences.

    Conclusions:

    • Selective phenotyping is a powerful strategy to boost genetic mapping sensitivity and efficiency.
    • This approach is particularly valuable in studies where phenotyping resources are limited.
    • The method offers a cost-effective alternative to large-scale random sampling in genetic research.