Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Beyond randomized, controlled trials.

Didier Dreyfuss1

  • 1Intensive Care Medicine Department, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), France. didier.dreyfuss@lmr.ap-hop-paris.fr

Current Opinion in Critical Care
|December 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The UNDERSCORE for RRT weaning prediction: promising but not yet ready to unplug. Author's reply.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

Predictive factors of successful renal replacement therapy weaning : Deciding On patients Orientations after Renal replacement therapy Stopping (The DOORS study).

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

Prognosis of critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury and high circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3: a post hoc analysis of the AKIKI 2 trial.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Early biomarker detection: fundamentally disputable? Authors' Reply.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

Biomarkers and the prediction of acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy initiation: a dream within a dream.

Intensive care medicine·2025
Same author

Trends in renal replacement therapy use in intensive care unit: insights from a French multicenter cohort.

Intensive care medicine·2025
Same journal

How to establish and run a national ICU benchmarking registry.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Cardiogenic shock - toward phenotype-directed, precision management.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

The future of critical care nutrition: from calorie counting to precision personalized metabolism therapy.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Editorial introduction.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Generative artificial intelligence for outcome prediction in critical care: the future is now?

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Feeding under support in critical care illness: metabolic and nutritional management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
See all related articles

Randomized controlled trials may be overemphasized in critical care. This review suggests observational studies offer comparable insights and better patient protection, questioning the future of RCTs in this field.

Area of Science:

  • Critical care medicine
  • Clinical research methodology
  • Medical ethics

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are widely considered the gold standard for evidence in critical care.
  • However, their actual impact on clinical practice and knowledge advancement is debated.
  • Concerns exist regarding patient and proxy protection within RCTs compared to other study designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the overemphasis on randomized controlled trials in critical care.
  • To compare the evidentiary value and ethical considerations of RCTs versus physiologic and observational studies.
  • To forecast the future role of RCTs in critically ill patient populations.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of recent studies in critical care.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of conclusions drawn from RCTs and their impact on practice.
  • Examination of ethical principles in relation to RCTs.

    • Main Results:

    • Conclusions from recent critical care RCTs are often disputable or do not influence current practice.
    • Potential conflicts between RCT methodologies and ethical principles have been identified.
    • Observational and physiologic studies may provide comparable or superior evidence and ethical safeguards.

    Conclusions:

    • The importance of randomized controlled trials in critical care may be overstated.
    • Future funding and ethical/sociological considerations may lead to a decline in RCTs for critically ill patients.
    • A shift towards valuing other study designs like observational studies is suggested.