Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Monocular versus binocular pupillometry.

Sabine Kurz1, Frank Krummenauer, Norbert Pfeiffer

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Langenbeckstrasse, Mainz, Germany. kurz@augen.klinik.uni-mainz.de

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|December 25, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multifocal intraocular lenses in refractive lens exchange: Guidelines to optimize their use and indications.

Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia·2026
Same author

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Long-Term Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

Ray-Tracing-Based Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Combined Cataract Surgery and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Balanced Extended Vision Procedure: Preclinical Analysis of a Non-diffractive Approach to Full Range of Vision After Cataract Surgery.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

Long-Term Patient Acceptability and Adherence to Suprachoroidal Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Monitoring in Glaucoma.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same author

Diagonal haptic capture of an acrylic intraocular lens - Longterm safety and efficacy.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Light adjustable lens implantation with cataract surgery in eyes with macular pathology.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Use of intracameral antibiotics prophylaxis in patients with posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Dehydration and Rehydration Behavior of Ultra-High-Fluence Extracorporeal Cross-Linked Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (ECO-CAIRS).

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Multimodal Deep Learning for Predicting Postoperative Vault and Selecting ICL Sizes Using AS-OCT and UBM Images.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Reply: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Monocular pupil size measurements are larger than binocular ones under mesopic conditions. Binocular measurement better reflects real-life conditions and is recommended before refractive surgery for patients at risk of postoperative scotopic phenomena.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Pupil size measurement is crucial for ophthalmic assessments.
  • Understanding differences between monocular and binocular measurements under various lighting conditions is important for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify differences in pupil size measurements between monocular and binocular methods.
  • To compare these measurements under scotopic (dark) and mesopic (low light) conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Computerized dynamic pupillometry was employed.
  • Measurements were taken at three illumination levels: scotopic (0.03 lux), mesopic low (0.82 lux), and mesopic high (6.4 lux).
  • Seventy healthy volunteers (140 eyes) participated, with groups measured binocularly first or monocularly first.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Statistically significant differences in pupil size were observed.
  • Monocular measurements yielded larger pupil sizes under both low and high mesopic conditions (P=.000).
  • A trend towards larger monocular measurements was noted under scotopic conditions, approaching statistical significance.

Conclusions:

  • Binocular pupil size measurement may more accurately simulate a patient's daily environmental conditions.
  • Binocular measurement is recommended for patients with large pupil diameters who are at risk of postoperative scotopic phenomena, particularly before refractive surgery.