Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

A Sensitive and Specific Quantitation Method for Determination of Serum Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C by Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay
Published on: August 8, 2013
Comparison of differing C-reactive protein assay methods and their impact on cardiovascular risk assessment
Jessica L Clarke1, Jeffrey L Anderson, John F Carlquist
1Cardiovascular Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah 84143, USA.
Insights
Medium-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) assays correlate highly with high-sensitivity methods for predicting cardiac events. While absolute values differ, quartile ranks remain similar, validating prior research findings.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomarker Assays
Background:
- C-reactive protein (CRP) is a key biomarker for inflammation and cardiovascular risk.
- Assessing CRP levels aids in predicting adverse cardiovascular events like myocardial infarction.
- Different assay sensitivities exist, potentially impacting clinical interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a medium-sensitivity CRP assay with a high-sensitivity assay in a patient cohort.
- To evaluate the concordance of predictive values for mortality and myocardial infarction between the two assay types.
- To determine the validity of conclusions from previous studies using medium-sensitivity CRP assays.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 803 patients undergoing coronary angiography was studied.
- A medium-sensitivity CRP assay was compared against a high-sensitivity, enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay.
- Statistical analysis focused on absolute values, quartile ranks, and predictive values for clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in absolute CRP values were observed between the two assays.
- A high correlation was found when data was analyzed by quartile rank.
- Both assays demonstrated similar predictive values for death and myocardial infarction.
Conclusions:
- Conclusions from previous studies using medium-sensitivity CRP assays remain valid.
- Cross-study comparisons of CRP data should utilize percentile ranks rather than absolute values.
- High-sensitivity CRP assays provide comparable prognostic information to medium-sensitivity assays for cardiovascular risk stratification.
Abstract:
A medium-sensitivity assay for C-reactive protein (CRP) was compared with a high-sensitivity, enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay in 803 angiographically studied patients. Different absolute CRP values were found by the assays, but there was a high correlation by quartile rank and similar predictive values for death and myocardial infarction. This suggests that the conclusions of previous studies performed using the medium-sensitivity assay are still valid but that cross-study comparisons should use percentile rank.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...