Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Class III malocclusion: surgery or orthodontics?

W J Kerr1, S Miller, J E Dawber

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School.

British Journal of Orthodontics
|February 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis in 1.0 T using 3D phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography and dynamic contrast medium perfusion].

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·1999
Same author

Calcium sensing in cultured chondrogenic RCJ3.1C5.18 cells.

Endocrinology·1999
Same author

Activated recombinant human coagulation factor VII therapy for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Results of the novoseven emergency-use program.

Haemostasis·1999
Same author

Evaluation of a new protection technique for heart preservation of non-heart-beating donors.

Transplantation proceedings·1999
Same author

[Cardiac MRI for determining functional left ventricular parameters].

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·1999
Same author

[Optimization of numerical measurement parameters for ECG-triggered MRI snapshot-FLASH myocardial perfusion studies].

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·1999
Same journal

The bedfordshire PDS orthodontic pilot.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Reviews and abstracts

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Re: Forestadent travel award.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Re: Orthologic 'A' company award for 1997.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Digital cameras.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
Same journal

Cortical bone screws for maxillomandibular fixation in orthognathic surgery.

British journal of orthodontics·1999
See all related articles

Severe Class III malocclusion treatment decisions were predicted by cephalometric measurements. Angle ANB and lower incisor inclination significantly differed between orthodontic and surgical groups, aiding treatment planning.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Cephalometric Analysis
  • Skeletal Malocclusion

Background:

  • Severe Class III malocclusions present complex treatment challenges.
  • Differentiating between orthodontic correction and orthognathic surgery is crucial for optimal outcomes.
  • Predictive cephalometric markers can aid in treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare cephalometric parameters between Class III malocclusion patients selected for orthodontic treatment versus orthognathic surgery.
  • To identify significant cephalometric differences that can predict treatment modality.
  • To establish threshold values for key cephalometric variables to guide treatment decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 40 subjects with severe Class III malocclusions were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects were divided into two groups: 20 for orthodontic correction and 20 for orthognathic surgery.
  • Key cephalometric variables including angle ANB, M/M ratio, lower incisor inclination, and Holdaway angle were measured and compared.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences were observed in angle ANB (P < 0.001), M/M ratio (P < 0.001), lower incisor inclination (P < 0.01), and Holdaway angle (P < 0.01) between the groups.
    • Threshold values were identified: angle ANB below -4 degrees and lower incisor angulation below 83 degrees were strongly associated with surgical intervention.
    • These cephalometric parameters effectively differentiated between patients suitable for orthodontics versus surgery.

    Conclusions:

    • Cephalometric analysis, particularly angle ANB and lower incisor inclination, plays a vital role in determining the appropriate treatment for severe Class III malocclusions.
    • Established threshold values can serve as valuable guidelines for clinicians in treatment planning, optimizing patient care.
    • Accurate cephalometric assessment aids in selecting between orthodontic correction and orthognathic surgery for improved treatment outcomes.