Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding erectile dysfunction medication preference studies.

John P Mulhall1

  • 1Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. jpm2005@med.cornell.edu

Current Opinion in Urology
|January 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comparative evaluation of on-demand phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor efficacy in erectile dysfunction treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

Selective pump replacement for inflatable penile prosthesis malfunction.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

Predictors of clomiphene citrate response in the treatment of men with testosterone deficiency.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

Prevalence and predictors of bone density loss in men with low testosterone.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

Extended corporal dilation decreases the need for intraoperative adjuvant maneuvers for residual curvature after inflatable penile implant placement in men with Peyronie's disease.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

The burden of Peyronie's disease on the female partner: a qualitative study.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same journal

Role and relevance of genetic testing in patients with kidney stones: a review from EAU Section of Endourology.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Advances in evaluating and delivering nontechnical skills training: The use of simulation, robotics, artificial intelligence and virtual reality.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Educating for a sustainable future: faculty and student perspectives and a review of environmental sustainability in medical education - an EAU endourology study.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Shaping the future of endourology: role of education, simulation and uro-technology: a scoping review by the EAU Section of Endourology.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

A review of emerging technologies and techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy access.

Current opinion in urology·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence in kidney cancer: a review of clinical applications across the disease spectrum.

Current opinion in urology·2026
See all related articles

With multiple phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors available, patient preference is increasingly studied. However, the clinical impact of these preference studies on erectile dysfunction treatment decisions remains unclear.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • The availability of three phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors has intensified drug marketing.
  • This has shifted clinical trial focus from efficacy and safety to patient preference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the methodology and impact of patient preference studies for phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors.
  • To assess how patient preference influences clinical decision-making in erectile dysfunction management.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of basic guidelines for conducting preference studies, including double-blinding, unbiased instructions, crossover design, equivalent doses, standardized assessment, demographic data, and statistical analysis.
  • Review of three published preference studies in light of these guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No current consensus exists on the optimal methodology for preference studies.
  • Key methodological considerations include double-blinding, unbiased instructions, crossover design, dose equivalence, standardized assessment, demographic reporting, and rigorous statistical analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The clinical utility of patient preference studies in guiding clinician decision-making for erectile dysfunction remains uncertain.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the impact of preference data on treatment choices.