Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gap effect in reflexive and intentional prosaccades.

Luc Crevits1, André Vandierendonck

  • 1Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. luc.crevits@ugent.be

Neuropsychobiology
|January 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary

The gap effect, a shortening of saccade latency, is smaller for intentional prosaccades (IpS) than reflexive saccades (RS). This suggests endogenous strategic processes, not just reflex inhibition, influence eye movement control.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: On the Utility of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures when Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off is Present.

Journal of cognition·2021
Same author

On the Utility of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures when Speed-Accuracy Trade-off is Present.

Journal of cognition·2021
Same author

How the Working Memory with Distributed Executive Control Model Accounts for Task Switching and Dual-Task Coordination Costs.

Journal of cognition·2021
Same author

Further Tests of the Utility of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures in Task Switching.

Journal of cognition·2019
Same author

Wall-eyed Bilateral Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) in a Patient With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

The neurologist·2018
Same author

Working memory benchmarks-A missed opportunity: Comment on Oberauer et al. (2018).

Psychological bulletin·2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Saccadic eye movements are crucial for understanding neuropsychiatric diseases.
  • Previous research noted a 'gap effect' where saccade latency shortens when fixation is removed before a target appears.
  • This gap effect is less pronounced for antisaccades (AS) than reflexive saccades (RS).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if intentional prosaccades (IpS), which lack the complex inhibition of AS, also exhibit a reduced gap effect.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms contributing to the gap effect in different saccade types.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of the gap effect in a saccade paradigm for reflexive saccades (RS) and intentional prosaccades (IpS) in healthy subjects.
  • Utilizing a saccade task to measure reaction times and analyze eye movement behavior.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A significantly smaller gap effect was observed for intentional prosaccades (IpS) compared to reflexive saccades (RS).
  • This reduction in IpS suggests the involvement of endogenous strategic processes in modulating saccade latency.

Conclusions:

  • The findings indicate that reflex inhibition alone does not fully explain the smaller gap effect in antisaccades (AS) compared to reflexive saccades (RS).
  • An endogenous component, potentially involving frontal control over superior colliculus fixation cells, likely contributes to the reduced gap effect in IpS and AS.
  • This suggests a more complex interplay of inhibitory and strategic control in saccadic eye movement generation.