Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prioritizing candidate reproductive/developmental toxicants for evaluation.

J M Donald1, L E Monserrat, K Hooper

  • 1California Department of Health Services, Health Hazard Assessment Division, Sacramento 95814.

Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Residential indoor PM2.5 in wood stove homes: follow-up of the Libby changeout program.

Indoor air·2012
Same author

Subpectoral abscess.

The West Virginia medical journal·2010
Same author

Circadian activity associated with spatial learning and memory in aging rhesus monkeys.

Experimental neurology·2009
Same author

Results of a residential indoor PM2.5 sampling program before and after a woodstove changeout.

Indoor air·2008
Same author

Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotides enhance the cytotoxicity of chlorambucil in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2001
Same author

Effect of essential amino acids on mouse embryo viability and ammonium production.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2001
Same journal

Retraction notice to "Trehalose restores functional autophagy suppressed by high glucose" [Reprod. Toxicol. 85 (2019) 51-58].

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Exposure to toxic metals/metalloids in the environment and in vitro fertilization outcomes in a population group from Romania.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Gadolinium induces Sertoli cell damage: cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Influence of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on spermatogenesis and sperm function in rodent models: A systematic review.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Microplastics as trojan horses: A new perspective on bisphenol toxicity in male infertility and assisted reproduction.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Effects of prenatal pyrethroid pesticides exposure on neurodevelopment of 3-year-old children: A birth cohort study in rural Southwest China.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

California developed a prioritization scheme to identify potential reproductive toxicants for review. This method focuses on human exposure and hazard, prioritizing the top 15 chemicals for timely evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Evaluating reproductive and developmental toxicants is crucial for public health protection.
  • Existing methods for identifying and prioritizing such chemicals can be time-consuming.
  • A systematic approach is needed to efficiently assess potential hazards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a rational and timely prioritization scheme for identifying potential reproductive/developmental toxicants.
  • To select chemicals for review by the Proposition 65 Scientific Advisory Panel.
  • To establish a systematic process for evaluating chemical risks to reproduction and development.

Main Methods:

  • A master list of 164 candidate agents was generated using four ascertainment methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two key criteria were applied: potential for human exposure and expert-judged reproductive/developmental hazard.
  • An ad hoc committee of experts evaluated the candidate agents.

    • Main Results:

    • A total of 42 priority agents were identified from the master list.
    • The top 15 ranked priority agents will receive the highest priority for review.
    • The scheme provides a structured method for chemical selection.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed prioritization scheme offers a rational method for timely evaluation of toxicants.
    • The scheme effectively identifies chemicals with potential human exposure and hazard.
    • Refinements are planned for future annual updates to improve the prioritization process.