Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does mutual interference always stabilize predator-prey dynamics? A comparison of models.

Roger Arditi1, Jean-Marc Callois, Yuri Tyutyunov

  • 1Ecologie des populations et Conmmunautés, Institut National Agronomiqnie Paris-Grignon, 16, rue Claude-Bernard, 75231 Paris, France. arditi@inapg.fr

Comptes Rendus Biologies
|January 5, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Predator interference can stabilize ecosystems, but only up to a point. Too much interference benefits stability but drastically reduces predator populations, impacting ecosystem resilience.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Will a large complex model ecosystem be viable? The essential role of positive interactions.

Ecology·2025
Same author

Does mutual interference stabilize prey-predator model with Bazykin-Crowley-Martin trophic function?

Mathematical biosciences·2024
Same author

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells engineered to recognize the P329G-mutated Fc part of effector-silenced tumor antigen-targeting human IgG1 antibodies enable modular targeting of solid tumors.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2022
Same author

Thermostable designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) as building blocks for innovative drugs.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2021
Same author

Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras Enhance T Cell Bispecific Antibody-Driven T Cell Activation and Effector Function through Increased MHC Class I Antigen Presentation in Cancer Cells.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2021
Same author

Self-organized biotectonics of termite nests.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Mathematical Biology
  • Theoretical Ecology

Background:

  • Predator-prey dynamics are fundamental to ecosystem stability.
  • Predator interference, where predators hinder each other, is a key factor influencing these dynamics.
  • Understanding interference is crucial for predicting ecosystem resilience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare alternative predator-prey models incorporating predator-dependent functional responses.
  • To elucidate the role of predator interference in stabilizing trophic systems.
  • To analyze how different mathematical formulations of interference affect ecological stability.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) systems.
  • Comparison of various mathematical models representing predator interference.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of model outputs under varying levels of predator interference.

    • Main Results:

    • Increasing predator interference generally enhances asymptotic stability and ecosystem resilience at low levels.
    • At high interference levels, the positive effect on stability diminishes or reverses.
    • Logistic prey growth with high interference ensures stability but results in minimal predator densities.

    Conclusions:

    • Predator interference has a complex, non-monotonic effect on trophic system stability.
    • The level of predator interference is a critical parameter for ecosystem resilience.
    • Further research into the evolutionary implications of interference levels in real ecosystems is warranted.