Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rooting a phylogenetic tree with nonreversible substitution models.

Von Bing Yap1, Terry Speed

  • 1Mathematics Department, University of California, 970 Evans Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. vonbing@math.berkeley.edu

BMC Evolutionary Biology
|January 5, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

KIF21A regulates breast cancer aggressiveness and is prognostic of patient survival and tumor recurrence.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2021
Same author

ADP ribosyl-cyclases (CD38/CD157), social skills and friendship.

Psychoneuroendocrinology·2017
Same author

Standard Codon Substitution Models Overestimate Purifying Selection for Nonstationary Data.

Genome biology and evolution·2017
Same author

Statistical Methods for Identifying Sequence Motifs Affecting Point Mutations.

Genetics·2016
Same author

Genetic distance for a general non-stationary markov substitution process.

Systematic biology·2014
Same author

The embedding problem for markov models of nucleotide substitution.

PloS one·2013

The nonstationary process significantly outperforms the stationary process in correctly rooting phylogenetic trees without an outgroup. This method offers a simpler and more accurate approach for root inference in evolutionary biology.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Molecular evolution

Background:

  • Phylogenetic tree rooting is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships.
  • Traditional methods often require an outgroup, which may not always be available.
  • Two rooting methods, stationary and nonstationary substitution processes, were compared.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of stationary versus nonstationary substitution processes for phylogenetic tree rooting.
  • To determine which method provides more accurate root placement, especially when an outgroup is absent.

Main Methods:

  • Maximum likelihood estimation was used to determine branch lengths and substitution parameters for rooted trees.
  • Rooted trees were compared based on their likelihood values.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Variation in substitution rates across sites was addressed by classifying sites into distinct rate categories.

    • Main Results:

    • The nonstationary process demonstrated significantly higher accuracy in root estimation compared to the stationary process across three test datasets.
    • The nonstationary process provided a substantially better fit to the data.
    • Both methods yielded biologically plausible root placements for primate mitochondrial DNA sequences.

    Conclusions:

    • The nonstationary substitution process is a more effective and user-friendly method for inferring phylogenetic tree roots.
    • This approach is particularly valuable in scenarios where an outgroup is not available for phylogenetic analysis.