Specialism and generalism in the future of general surgery

The progressive specialism that has characterized the practice of medicine over the last 100 years has occurred almost entirely in a scientific context. Societal needs and social changes have had little influence. As we near the end of the 20th century the benefits of scientific specialism are being questioned. New historical studies of specialism have shown that factors other than new knowledge are the driving force for the creation of some subspecialties. The process by which a new subspecialty is established requires both a national institute and a certification examination. Certification is intended to identify those with specific knowledge and skill by inclusion, but is being perceived increasingly as a process that works by exclusion. General surgery, one of the few "generalist" disciplines, finds itself at a crossroads. Further subspecialization with certification will fragment and destroy the discipline. There are cogent arguments, based on economics and care-delivery issues, to preserve general surgery. Making this choice will commit general surgeons to accept the concept of scientific generalism and to the development of the specialty of general surgery in a social context.