Related Experiment Videos
Patients who leave the pediatric emergency department without being seen: a case-control study
Ran D Goldman1, Alison Macpherson, Suzanne Schuh
1Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave,. Toronto ON M5G 1X8. ran.goldman@sickkids.ca
Insights
Children leaving the pediatric emergency department (ED) without being seen often had less severe conditions and sought care elsewhere. Long waits and symptom resolution were primary reasons for departure.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Healthcare Access and Quality
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- A significant percentage of children leave pediatric emergency departments (EDs) without physician assessment, potentially leading to adverse health outcomes.
- Understanding the characteristics and reasons for these departures is crucial for improving emergency care delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare children who left the ED without being seen (LWBS) to those who stayed and received care.
- To identify factors associated with LWBS and their subsequent healthcare utilization.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study comparing LWBS children with matched controls who were seen by a pediatrician.
- Data collection involved parental interviews and ED medical record abstraction.
- The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) was used to assess illness severity.
Main Results:
- 3% of children left the ED without being seen; 56% of these participated in the study.
- LWBS children had lower illness acuity (CTAS scores) compared to controls.
- Long waiting times (58%) and symptom resolution (37%) were the main reasons for leaving.
- Children who left were more likely to seek care elsewhere (63% vs. 28%).
Conclusions:
- Children leaving the ED without being seen generally had less severe conditions and were more likely to receive follow-up care at alternative facilities.
- Addressing long wait times and understanding symptom evolution are key to reducing LWBS rates in pediatric EDs.
Background:
Children who visit pediatric emergency departments (EDs) and leave before being seen by a physician may present with particular health problems and may be at risk for preventable health outcomes. We compared children who left without being seen with those who stayed and were seen by a pediatrician, and followed all of the study subjects after they left the ED.
Methods:
We asked all parents of children who visited the ED between July 1 and Oct. 31, 2002, to participate. Parents were interviewed by a trained ED research assistant. We abstracted data from the ED medical records. We used the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to measure the acuity of the illness or injury. Each child who left without being seen was matched with 2 children who had been seen by selecting the next patients on an alphabetical list by day, sex and age (within 1 year). We did follow-up interviews with parents within 96 hours of the visit to determine the reason for leaving and any treatment and diagnoses received subsequent to the ED visit.
Results:
Of the 11 087 children seen in the ED during the study period, 289 (3%) left without being seen. Of the 289, the families of 158 (56%) consented to participate in the study and met the study criteria. The case and control groups thus consisted of 158 and 316 children respectively. Of the children who left without being seen, 24 (15%) were triaged as "urgent," and none had a CTAS score of less than 3. A total of 99 children (63%) who left were taken by their families elsewhere for further medical care, compared with 89 (28%) of those who stayed. Waiting too long and resolution of symptoms accounted for 92 (58%) and 59 (37%) of the premature departures respectively. One child who left without being seen was subsequently admitted to hospital. Multivariate analysis showed that, after adjustment for time of arrival and time to reach the ED, children who left without being seen had lower acuity than those who stayed (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-7.2) and were more likely to register in the ED between midnight and 4 am (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.8- 12.5). Children in the premature departure group were also more likely to be taken elsewhere for follow-up care (unadjusted OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.9-6.4).
Interpretation:
Children who left the ED without being seen had lower acuity levels and were more likely to be taken elsewhere for follow-up care than children who stayed. Most of those who left did so because the wait was too long or their symptoms resolved.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Blind Procedures
Censoring Survival Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...