Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis.

S A Hurst1, S C Hull, G DuVal

  • 1Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. samia.hurst@medecine.unige.ch

Journal of Medical Ethics
|January 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Good Hearing for Ensuring Healthy Aging.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2022
Same author

Hypercalcemia as a Biomarker of Poor Prognosis in Frail Elderly Patients with COVID-19.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2021
Same author

Bulletin de la Societe de pathologie exotique (1990)·2019
Same author

Analytical solution for bending vibration of a thin-walled cylinder rolling on a time-varying force.

Royal Society open science·2018
Same author

Past, present and future challenges in health care priority setting.

Journal of health organization and management·2018
Same author

Association of hypovitaminosis D with triceps brachii muscle fatigability among older women: Findings from the EPIDOS cohort.

Maturitas·2018
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Physicians often avoid conflict and seek assistance when facing ethical dilemmas, sometimes compromising patient interests. Understanding these competing goals is crucial for effective medical ethics decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Qualitative Research
  • Physician Decision-Making

Background:

  • Physicians frequently encounter ethical difficulties but rarely seek formal ethics consultation.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding physicians' strategies for resolving ethical dilemmas independently.
  • This study addresses the gap by analyzing physicians' self-reported approaches to ethical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze the strategies physicians employ when navigating ethical difficulties in their practice.
  • To understand the goals physicians pursue and the potential conflicts arising during ethical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of 310 ethically difficult situations described by physicians.
  • Data collected via computer-assisted telephone interviews with internists, oncologists, and intensive care specialists.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsEmpirical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Grounded theory approach used for coding and analysis of physician responses.

    • Main Results:

    • Physicians prioritized avoiding conflict, seeking assistance, and protecting personal/group integrity.
    • These strategies sometimes supported ethical goals (e.g., patient wishes) but occasionally conflicted with them.
    • Competing goals among physicians and with ethical imperatives were frequently observed.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians navigate ethical difficulties with competing goals, not always achieving desired outcomes.
    • The methods used to resolve ethical dilemmas may not always be the most effective.
    • Awareness of these competing goals is vital for physicians and ethics consultants to improve ethical decision-making in medical practice.