Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Following in Real Time the Impact of Pneumococcal Virulence Factors in an Acute Mouse Pneumonia Model Using Bioluminescent Bacteria
Published on: February 23, 2014
The influence of competition and vaccination on the coexistence of two pneumococcal serotypes
Y Zhang1, K Auranen, M Eichner
1Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. yidi.zhang@uni-tuebingen.de
Insights
Competition between Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) serotypes impacts colonization, especially with short-term immunity. Vaccination
Area of Science:
- * Microbiology and Immunology
- * Epidemiology and Public Health
- * Mathematical Modeling in Biology
Background:
- * Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is a major bacterial pathogen causing diverse mucosal infections and severe diseases globally.
- * Over 90 pneumococcal serotypes exist, competing for nasopharyngeal colonization.
- * Protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines protect against vaccine-targeted serotypes but raise concerns about the rise of non-targeted serotypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To investigate the influence of direct and indirect competition between pneumococcal serotypes on their coexistence.
- * To model the impact of vaccination on serotype prevalence and the potential emergence of non-vaccine serotypes.
- * To assess the role of naturally acquired immunity duration in serotype competition dynamics.
Main Methods:
- * Utilized transmission models to simulate pneumococcal carriage dynamics.
- * Analyzed the interplay between direct (physical) and indirect (antibody-mediated) competition.
- * Incorporated varying durations of naturally acquired immunity and vaccination strategies.
Main Results:
- * Direct competition significantly affects colonization only when naturally acquired immunity is short-lived.
- * Indirect competition is influential primarily with long-lasting naturally acquired immunity.
- * Vaccination reduces target serotype prevalence, an effect amplified by direct competition.
- * Emergence of non-target serotypes post-vaccination is observed only under direct bacterial competition.
Conclusions:
- * The type of competition (direct vs. indirect) critically influences pneumococcal serotype dynamics.
- * The duration of naturally acquired immunity is a key factor in determining the impact of competition.
- * Understanding competition mechanisms and immunity duration is vital for predicting long-term vaccine effects and serotype replacement.
Abstract:
Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is one of the most important bacterial pathogens and a leading cause of mucosal infections (e.g. otitis media) and various forms of serious diseases (e.g. pneumonia, meningitis, bacteraemia) in developing and developed countries. Based on the polysaccharide capsule, there are at least 90 different pneumococcal serotypes, which may compete with each other to colonize the nasopharynx. Newly developed protein-polysaccharide conjugated vaccines have been shown to provide protection against disease caused by the serotypes included in the vaccine, and also against colonization (carriage). It is feared that yet uncommon, but nonetheless pathogenic serotypes which have been suppressed by competition, may become more prevalent in carriage and disease after large-scale use of conjugate vaccines. In this paper, we use transmission models of pneumococcal carriage to study how competition and vaccination influence the coexistence of two serotypes. According to our results, direct (physical) competition between two pneumococcal serotypes only influences colonization if the duration of naturally acquired immunity is short. By contrast, indirect (antibody-mediated) competition is of influence only if naturally acquired immunity is long lasting. Vaccination reduces the prevalence of the target serotype--an effect that is enforced by the presence of directly competing bacteria. The emergence of a non-target serotype after vaccination is only observed if bacteria compete directly. These results emphasize the importance of studying whether bacteria compete directly or indirectly and for how long people are protected in order to assess the long-term effects of sero-competition.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Interactions: Competition
Determinants of Bacterial Pathogenicity and Virulence
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Smallpox
Vaccinations
Poliomyelitis

