Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current trends in pediatric microsurgery.

Joseph M Serletti1

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Box 661, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. joseph_serletti@urmc.rochester.edu

Clinics in Plastic Surgery
|January 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intraoperative Versus Postoperative Correction of Vascular Compromise: Comparison of Flap and Patient Outcomes in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery·2026
Same author

The Other Side: Outcomes of the Nonradiated Breast in Bilateral Reconstruction With Unilateral Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Larger-Volume Silicone Breast Implants Are Safe in Breast Reconstruction: The Athena Multicenter Prospective Study of 400 Patients.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Defining BMI Thresholds for Free Flap Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Microsurgery·2025
Same author

A Closer Look at Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Direct-to-Implant versus 2-Stage Outcomes.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025
Same author

The Impact of Psychiatric Comorbidities on Outcomes and Quality of Life in Plastic Surgery: A Literature Review and Matched Analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025
Same journal

Lower-Extremity Reconstruction: Principles, Progress, and Perspectives.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Pediatric.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Acute Burns.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds: Updates on Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Updates in Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Post Sarcoma.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Fillet Flaps for Lower Extremity Salvage.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Free tissue transfer is a common reconstructive surgery for various defects in adults. This review focuses on microsurgical techniques and considerations unique to pediatric free tissue transfer, including growth impacts.

Area of Science:

  • Microsurgery
  • Pediatric Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Free tissue transfer is a standard reconstructive procedure for defects from trauma, tumors, or vascular insufficiency.
  • While commonly performed in adults, its application in pediatric patients presents unique challenges and considerations.
  • Existing literature includes pediatric-specific series, highlighting differences from adult procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review microsurgical practices for pediatric free tissue transfer.
  • To discuss etiologies, donor/recipient site selection, and technical aspects in children.
  • To address potential growth disturbances at recipient and donor sites in pediatric patients.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common microsurgical practices in pediatric free tissue transfer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of etiologies leading to reconstructive needs in children.
  • Analysis of donor and recipient site selection criteria specific to pediatric patients.

    • Main Results:

    • Pediatric free tissue transfer requires tailored approaches compared to adults.
    • Considerations for donor and recipient sites must account for growth potential.
    • Potential for growth disturbances at both donor and recipient sites is a critical factor.

    Conclusions:

    • Microsurgical reconstruction in children necessitates specialized techniques.
    • Careful site selection and technique are vital to minimize growth disturbances.
    • Understanding pediatric-specific factors is crucial for successful free tissue transfer outcomes.