Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When written advance directives are not enough.

Kristi L Kirschner1

  • 1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 345 East Superior, Suite 1122, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. kkirschner@rehabchicago.org

Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
|January 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Advance directives help guide healthcare decisions for incapacitated patients. However, their limitations in providing real-time, context-specific guidance necessitate a dynamic approach to patient-centered care.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medical Humanities and Disability Studies: In/Disciplines, by Stuart Murray. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023.

The Journal of medical humanities·2024
Same author

Ethical aspects of the disfavored discharge.

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2023
Same author

Considering Dignity of Risk in the Care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Clinical Perspective.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2022
Same author

If Not Now, Then When? Taking Disability Seriously in Bioethics.

The Hastings Center report·2022
Same author

Ableism at the Bedside: People with Intellectual Disabilities and COVID-19.

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM·2022
Same author

Persistent Gaps in the Care of Patients with Disability: Laws Are Necessary but Not Sufficient.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Law
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Advance directives are promoted as essential tools for patient decision-making when individuals cannot communicate their wishes.
  • Existing beliefs suggest advance directives definitively guide healthcare professionals, resolving conflicts and clarifying care pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing research on advance directives, encompassing both proxy and instructional types.
  • To critically discuss the inherent strengths and limitations of various advance directive formats.
  • To propose strategies for utilizing advance directives as dynamic tools that support patient-centered decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of research on advance directives.
  • Analysis of strengths and limitations of proxy and instructional documents.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of research findings to inform practical recommendations.

    • Main Results:

    • Advance directives are often perceived as static, binding legal documents.
    • The capacity of current advance directives to provide context-based, real-time decisions may be overestimated.
    • Research highlights both the utility and the constraints of these documents in clinical practice.

    Conclusions:

    • Advance directives, while valuable, have limitations in addressing complex, real-time medical decisions.
    • A more dynamic and flexible approach is needed to leverage advance directives effectively.
    • Recommendations focus on using advance directives to facilitate, rather than dictate, patient-centered care discussions and decisions.