Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention.

Jochen Laubrock1, Ralf Engbert, Reinhold Kliegl

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, P.O. Box 601553, 14415 Potsdam, Germany. laubrock@rz.uni-postdam.de

Vision Research
|January 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medicine ball throw distance weighted with height-to-mass ratio aligns with other physical fitness tasks.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Color needs luminance for visual selection during scene search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Goal-directed behavior and hippocampal activity predict real-life impact of drinking intentions in alcohol use disorder.

Translational psychiatry·2025
Same author

Interindividual and intraindividual differences in recovery of German junior female ice hockey players during 2020 World Championship Division IA tournament.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Secular Trends of Children's Physical Fitness and the Impact of the COVID-Pandemic for Years 2012 to 2023.

Sports medicine - open·2025
Same author

Bayesian Dynamical Modeling of Fixational Eye Movements.

Biological cybernetics·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Spatial attention shifts affect microsaccades differently based on cue type. Exogenous cues trigger automatic saccades then inhibition, while endogenous cues show late, weak directional effects on microsaccade rate and direction.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Microsaccades, small, rapid eye movements, are crucial for visual processing.
  • Covert spatial attention shifts, without eye movements, influence visual perception.
  • Understanding how attention modulates microsaccades is key to visual neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of exogenous and endogenous cues on microsaccade rate and direction.
  • To investigate the temporal dynamics of attention-driven microsaccade modulation.
  • To differentiate the roles of automatic versus controlled processes in attention-related eye movements.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual attention task using exogenous and endogenous cues.
  • Microsaccade rate and direction were recorded during covert spatial attention shifts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on dissociating effects based on cue type (exogenous vs. endogenous) and cue validity.

    • Main Results:

    • Microsaccade rate showed initial inhibition followed by sustained enhancement after display changes.
    • Microsaccade direction effects differed significantly between exogenous and endogenous cues.
    • Exogenous cues induced rapid, cue-directed saccades followed by inhibition, whereas endogenous cues had late, weak directional effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Covert spatial attention modulates microsaccades in a cue-dependent manner.
    • Exogenous cues engage rapid, automatic saccade programming and subsequent inhibition.
    • Endogenous cues influence microsaccades through slower, controlled attentional mechanisms.