Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement.

Franz-Josef Kramer1, Carola Baethge, Gwen Swennen

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Kramer.Franz@MH-Hannover.de

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|January 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divergence in intra-tumor variant frequencies in sporadic vestibular schwannomas as a potential indication for mosaic NF2-related schwannomatosis?

Neurogenetics·2026
Same author

Assessing Mandibular Condylar and Coronoid Pathologies: A Computed Tomography-Based Normalization Approach.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Next-generation sequencing improves pathogen identification in odontogenic abscesses, could this affect clinical outcomes?

Clinical oral investigations·2025
Same author

Microbial spectrum and resistance of odontogenic abscesses - microbiological analysis using next generation sequencing.

Clinical oral investigations·2024
Same author

Beneficial effects of non-invasive physical plasma on human periodontal ligament cells <i>in vitro</i>.

Frontiers in medicine·2024
Same author

Optic nerve and chiasm hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease: report of 12 cases and review of the literature.

Frontiers in oncology·2024

Computer-guided navigation significantly improved the precision of dental implant placement in laboratory settings. Navigated implant insertion demonstrated superior accuracy in position, angulation, and depth compared to conventional methods.

Area of Science:

  • Oral Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Dental Implantology

Background:

  • Computer-guided navigation is increasingly utilized in surgery for enhanced precision.
  • In oral implant placement, navigation aims to optimize implant positioning and minimize damage to adjacent anatomical structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the precision of conventional versus navigated implant insertion techniques.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of implant position, angulation, and insertion depth using both methods.

Main Methods:

  • Implants were inserted into maxillary cast models, replacing a central incisor and a canine.
  • Forty implants were placed: 20 conventionally and 20 using a computer-guided navigation system.
  • Implant position, angulation, and depth were assessed via computed tomography scans.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Navigated implant insertion showed significantly reduced variations in implant position (P < 0.05).
  • Navigation protocols led to significantly reduced variations in implant angulation in both axial and transversal planes (P < 0.05).
  • The variations in insertion depth were significantly less with navigated insertion compared to conventional methods (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • In vitro, computer-guided navigation improved the precision of dental implant insertion regarding position, angulation, and depth.
  • While promising, further clinical studies are required to confirm if routine image guidance leads to superior surgical outcomes.