Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protein structural influences in rhodopsin evolution.

Lorraine Marsh1, Carole S Griffiths

  • 1Department of Biology, Long Island University, USA. lorraine.marsh@liu.edu

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|January 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analysis of vocal communication in the genus Falco.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Strong Ligand-Protein Interactions Derived from Diffuse Ligand Interactions with Loose Binding Sites.

BioMed research international·2015
Same author

A novel inhibitor of Mammalian triosephosphate isomerase found by an in silico approach.

International journal of medicinal chemistry·2014
Same author

Altered intestinal epithelium-associated lymphocyte repertoires and function in ApcMin/+ mice.

International journal of oncology·2011
Same author

Prediction of ligand binding using an approach designed to accommodate diversity in protein-ligand interactions.

PloS one·2011
Same author

A model for protein sequence evolution based on selective pressure for protein stability: application to hemoglobins.

Evolutionary bioinformatics online·2009
Same journal

The life history of recessive deleterious alleles as seen through the eyes of a honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: Insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Structural information improves evolutionary models for protein-coding genes. Analyzing vertebrate rhodopsin revealed surface residues correlate with high substitution rates, leading to a more accurate phylogenetic tree when excluded.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Molecular evolution

Background:

  • Phylogenetic reconstruction of protein-coding genes requires realistic evolutionary models.
  • Vertebrate rhodopsin sequences were analyzed to understand evolutionary patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlation between protein structural characteristics and amino acid substitution rates.
  • To improve phylogenetic reconstruction by incorporating structural information.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed 62 vertebrate rhodopsin sequences.
  • Labeled residue sites based on surface accessibility, secondary structure, and transmembrane (TM) location.
  • Identified homoplasious residues using maximum parsimony (MP).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Surface residues, particularly in TM helices, showed a significant correlation with high amino acid substitution rates.
  • Excluding structurally defined residue classes from MP analysis resulted in a more accurate phylogeny.
  • Anomalies in species relationships were observed when all sites were included in MP analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Protein structural features, like surface accessibility and TM location, influence evolutionary rates.
  • A refined model for phylogenetic inference can be developed by accounting for structural influences on evolutionary rates.
  • Excluding specific structurally defined residue classes enhances phylogenetic accuracy.