Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An in situ toxicity identification evaluation method Part I: Laboratory validation.

G Allen Burton1, Juanita E Nordstrom

  • 1Institute for Environmental Quality, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio 45435, USA. allen.burton@wright.edu

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
|January 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary

The novel in situ toxicity identification evaluation (iTIE) method effectively fractionates and identifies toxic chemicals in sediments and water. This method proved more sensitive than the U.S. EPA TIE for assessing aquatic toxicity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unintentional Disinformation: A Cautionary Tale for Scientific Publishing.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same author

Distinguishing Natural and Anthropogenic stressors at a Groundwater-Surface Water Interface Using a Weight-of-Evidence Framework.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same author

A Plea for Cumulative Stressor Risk Assessments in Light of Climate Change.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Teasing out the Effects of Natural Stressors at Chemically Contaminated Sites.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2024
Same author

Has the Rio Doce "time bomb" been defused? Using a weight-of-evidence approach to determine sediment quality.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2023
Same author

Evaluation of Capping Materials to Reduce Zinc Flux from Sediments in a Former Mining Pit Lake.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2021

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Evaluating sediment and water quality requires identifying individual chemical groups causing toxicity.
  • Fractionating chemical mixtures is crucial for pinpointing toxic agents.
  • Existing methods like the U.S. EPA Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) have limitations in sensitivity and contaminant loss.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To verify the in situ toxicity identification evaluation (iTIE) method's ability to identify contaminant chemical classes.
  • To assess if iTIE improves the toxicity assessment process for aquatic organisms.
  • To compare the effectiveness and sensitivity of iTIE against the U.S. EPA TIE method.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a portable iTIE system using selective sorption materials (Ambersorb 563, Chelex, zeolites) to fractionate pore water contaminants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exposed Daphnia magna to fractionated pore water in an exposure chamber.
  • Conducted laboratory studies using spiked sediments and water with ammonia, cadmium, and fluoranthene.

    • Main Results:

    • The iTIE method successfully separated ammonia, cadmium, and fluoranthene using zeolite, Chelex, and Ambersorb, respectively.
    • Significant differences in contaminant concentrations and exposures were observed for in situ exposed organisms.
    • The iTIE method demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting toxicity compared to the U.S. EPA TIE.

    Conclusions:

    • The iTIE method is effective in fractionating and identifying toxic chemical classes in contaminated aquatic environments.
    • iTIE offers improved sensitivity for toxicity assessment, detecting toxicity more readily than the U.S. EPA TIE.
    • The 24-hour exposure period was optimal for the iTIE method, minimizing contaminant breakthrough.