Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A Bayesian approach to evaluating net clinical benefit allowed for parameter uncertainty.

Alexander J Sutton1, Nicola J Cooper, Keith R Abrams

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, United Kingdom. ajs22@le.ac.uk

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Individualized treatment decisions require evaluating net clinical benefit. This study reanalyzes warfarin use in atrial fibrillation, questioning prior conclusions due to data limitations but offering a Bayesian framework for personalized patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of outcomes on hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) in anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease: network meta-analyses in dialysis and non-dialysis dependent populations.

Clinical kidney journal·2024
Same author

A More Extensive Lymphadenectomy Enhances Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Annals of surgery·2020
Same author

Two-Year Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2020
Same author

Is Routine Chest Radiography Necessary After Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2020
Same author

Performance Comparison Between SURPAS and ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Pulmonary Resection.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2020
Same author

External Validation of Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System in Pulmonary Resection.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2020

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence Synthesis

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assess average treatment effects.
  • Individual patient benefits and harms may vary, necessitating personalized evaluation.
  • Lack of quantitative frameworks can obscure decision-making transparency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To revisit the decision of warfarin use for atrial fibrillation using a net clinical benefit approach.
  • To synthesize data from RCTs and observational studies for a more individualized assessment.
  • To present a Bayesian framework for quantifying uncertainty in treatment benefit estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Revisiting the net clinical benefit concept proposed by Glasziou and Irwig.
  • Synthesizing data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developing a Bayesian implementation for parameter uncertainty and probability statements.

    • Main Results:

    • The reanalysis challenges previous conclusions regarding patient groups benefiting from warfarin.
    • Limitations in available quality of life data necessitate caution in interpretation.
    • A Bayesian model is presented to handle parameter uncertainty.

    Conclusions:

    • The Bayesian framework allows for direct probability statements and credible intervals for specific patient groups.
    • This approach enhances transparency in individualized treatment decision-making.
    • Further research may be needed to address limitations in quality of life data.