Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing hypotheses: prediction and prejudice.

Peter Lipton1

  • 1Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK. Peter.Lipton@Kings.cam.ac.uk

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|January 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modeling molecular pathways of neuronal ischemia.

Progress in molecular biology and translational science·2014
Same author

Lysosomal membrane permeabilization as a key player in brain ischemic cell death: a "lysosomocentric" hypothesis for ischemic brain damage.

Translational stroke research·2013
Same author

Lysosomal release of cathepsins causes ischemic damage in the rat hippocampal slice and depends on NMDA-mediated calcium influx, arachidonic acid metabolism, and free radical production.

Journal of neurochemistry·2008
Same author

The Medawar Lecture 2004 the truth about science.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2005
Same author

Pharmacogenetics: ethical problems and solutions.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2004
Same author

Nuffield Council on Bioethics consultation.

Pharmacogenomics·2003
Same journal

A native sulfur deposit in Gale crater, Mars.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Coordinated demise of harmful algal blooms.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Genetic effects put into context.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Bacteria share proteins to survive antibiotics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Impacts shaped Earth's first continents.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Erratum for the Report "Covalently bonded single-molecule junctions with stable and reversible photoswitched conductivity" by C. Jia <i>et al</i>.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Scientific observations supporting a hypothesis can occur before or after its formulation. Evidence suggests predictions offer stronger support than accommodations due to reduced risk of data manipulation.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Statistics
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • The timing of observations relative to hypothesis formulation is a debated topic in scientific philosophy and statistics.
  • Observations can either precede (predictions) or follow (accommodations) a hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore whether the temporal relationship between observation and hypothesis formulation impacts the evidential support provided by the observation.
  • To analyze the philosophical and statistical arguments concerning the weight of predictive vs. accommodative evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of philosophical arguments regarding evidential support.
  • Examination of statistical considerations related to hypothesis testing and evidence evaluation.
  • Discussion of the concept of 'fudging' or data manipulation in scientific research.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Philosophers and statisticians hold differing views on the evidential value of predictions versus accommodations.
  • A significant argument posits that predictions carry more weight because they inherently avoid the risk of 'fudging' associated with accommodations.

Conclusions:

  • The temporal order of observations in relation to hypothesis formulation is a relevant factor in assessing evidential support.
  • Predictive evidence is often considered stronger than accommodative evidence due to its lower susceptibility to bias and manipulation.