Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening for colorectal cancer.

K Saliangas1

  • 1Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Edessa, Markou Botsari 114, GR-59100 Veria, Greece. salkost@otenet.gr

Techniques in Coloproctology
|January 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This review analyzes colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods for average-risk individuals, finding all tested modalities cost-effective. However, low compliance rates (30-40%) highlight a need for improved screening engagement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanical bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery: is it necessary?

Techniques in coloproctology·2011
Same author

Synchronous colorectal cancer.

Techniques in coloproctology·2005
Same author

Application of radionics on primary and metastatic tumours of the liver.

Techniques in coloproctology·2005
Same author

Mass screening for colorectal cancer: compliance in Almopea Region.

Techniques in coloproctology·2005
Same author

Stage of disease at time of attendance of patients with colorectal cancer at the Department of Surgery of the General Hospital of Edessa.

Techniques in coloproctology·2005
Same author

Treatment of complicated colorectal cancer. Evaluation of the outcome.

Techniques in coloproctology·2005

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is crucial for early detection.
  • Average-risk individuals require effective screening strategies.
  • Current literature review needed for comparative analysis of CRC screening modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and analyze literature on colorectal cancer screening strategies for average-risk individuals.
  • To evaluate the advantages, disadvantages, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of various CRC screening tests.
  • To report on the experience of a surgical department's FOBT-based screening program.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of colorectal cancer screening modalities.
  • Analysis of screening tests including FOBT, DNA tests, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT-colonography, and barium enema.
  • Evaluation of screening test efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and reported compliance rates.
  • Reporting on a specific screening program utilizing FOBT and colonoscopy.

Main Results:

  • All reviewed colorectal cancer screening tests are more cost-effective than no screening.
  • Screening modalities include fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), DNA tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT-colonography, and double contrast barium enema.
  • Reported compliance rates for CRC screening tests are low, ranging from 30-40%.

Conclusions:

  • All discussed colorectal cancer screening methods demonstrate cost-effectiveness compared to no intervention.
  • Low patient compliance remains a significant challenge in CRC screening programs.
  • Further strategies are needed to improve adherence to recommended colorectal cancer screening protocols.

Related Experiment Videos