Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental processes and canine dimorphism in primate evolution.

Gary T Schwartz1, Ellen R Miller, Gregg F Gunnell

  • 1Department of Anthropology & Institute of Human Origins, Box 872402, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA. garys.iho@asu.edu

Journal of Human Evolution
|January 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hominin postcranial remains from Drimolen Main Quarry, South Africa.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
Same author

New finds shed light on diet and locomotion in Australopithecus deyiremeda.

Nature·2025
Same author

Impact of intermittent lead exposure on hominid brain evolution.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Eighteen million years of diverse enamel proteomes from the East African Rift.

Nature·2025
Same author

Poor Oral Health Is Associated With Inflammation, Aortic Valve Calcification, and Brain Volume Among Forager-Farmers.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2024
Same author

Aspects of molar form and dietary proclivities of African colobines.

Journal of human evolution·2023

This study investigates how early primates developed differences in canine tooth size between males and females. By examining fossilized teeth from the Eocene genus Cantius, researchers discovered that these ancient primates achieved size differences through varying growth rates rather than the extended growth periods seen in modern species. This finding suggests that sexual dimorphism in primate teeth evolved independently multiple times throughout history.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology and canine dimorphism research within primatology
  • Developmental biology and paleontology

Background:

The origins of sexual differences in primate teeth remain a significant puzzle for evolutionary biologists. Prior research has shown that modern primates typically achieve these size variations through a process called bimaturism. This mechanism involves extending the duration of tooth development rather than altering the speed of enamel formation. However, the developmental pathways used by the earliest primates were previously unknown. No prior work had resolved whether these ancient patterns matched those observed in living species. That uncertainty drove this investigation into the fossil record. This study addresses the gap by examining the earliest known dimorphic primate, the Eocene genus Cantius. Understanding these ancestral processes provides a clearer picture of primate phylogenetic history.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aims to clarify the evolutionary history of canine sexual dimorphism within the primate lineage. Researchers sought to determine if the developmental processes observed in modern species were present in the earliest known dimorphic primates. This investigation addresses whether canine dimorphism was developmentally canalized during the early stages of primate evolution. The team focused on the Eocene genus Cantius to test these evolutionary hypotheses. They aimed to identify whether size differences were achieved through bimaturism or variations in growth rates. By charting the ontogeny of tooth formation, the authors intended to resolve long-standing questions about developmental homology. This work seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the socioecology and phylogenetic position of early primates. The motivation lies in identifying the underlying developmental mechanisms that produce morphological similarity in long-extinct species.

Keywords:
Eocene Cantiusenamel formationsexual selectionpaleoprimatologyontogeny

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that Cantius achieved canine dimorphism through varying rates of crown formation. In contrast, extant primates utilize bimaturism, which involves extending the duration of tooth development rather than altering the speed of enamel deposition.

The study utilized incremental growth lines found within fossilized teeth. These microscopic markers allow scientists to track the chronological progression of enamel deposition throughout the life of the individual primate.

The authors indicate that examining the earliest known canine-dimorphic primate is necessary to determine if these developmental patterns were canalized early in history. This specific genus provides a baseline for comparing ancestral and modern evolutionary trajectories.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The researchers employed a comparative approach to analyze the ontogeny of tooth development in fossil specimens. They utilized high-resolution imaging to identify incremental growth lines within the enamel of the teeth. This methodology allowed for the precise reconstruction of developmental timelines in the extinct genus Cantius. The team compared these ancient growth patterns against established models of bimaturism found in living primates. By measuring the duration and speed of crown formation, they could isolate the specific biological drivers of size variation. This quantitative assessment provided a clear distinction between different developmental strategies. The study design focused on the earliest known examples of sexually dimorphic primates to ensure evolutionary relevance. This rigorous framework enabled the researchers to test hypotheses regarding developmental canalization in early mammalian history.

Main Results:

The analysis reveals that canine dimorphism in Cantius is primarily driven by differences in crown formation rates between males and females. This finding contradicts the pattern of bimaturism observed in all extant primates. The data show that males and females of this genus grew their canine teeth at different velocities. This represents the first documented instance of rate-based dimorphism in any primate species. The results demonstrate that size differences do not require an extended growth period to manifest. These observations suggest that developmental pathways for canine size are not uniform across the primate order. The evidence indicates that similar morphological traits can arise from distinct biological mechanisms. The findings provide a new perspective on the diversity of evolutionary strategies in early primates.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that canine dimorphism in Cantius arises from distinct crown formation rates between sexes. This finding challenges the assumption that dimorphism is developmentally homologous across all primate lineages. The researchers suggest that sexual size variation likely emerged at least twice during evolutionary history. This study highlights how developmental mechanisms can differ despite similar morphological outcomes. The authors emphasize the utility of incremental growth lines for studying extinct species. This approach allows for the identification of underlying biological processes in the fossil record. The results indicate that evolutionary pressures have shaped canine development in diverse ways over time. These insights refine our understanding of the complex history of primate sexual dimorphism.

The researchers employed incremental growth data to reconstruct developmental timelines. This information serves as the primary evidence for identifying whether size differences resulted from growth duration or growth velocity.

The study measures the speed of crown formation in males versus females. By comparing these rates, the researchers identified that sexual dimorphism in this extinct genus was driven by velocity differences rather than timing shifts.

The authors propose that canine dimorphism is not developmentally homologous across all primates. They conclude that selective pressures likely favored the evolution of these traits on at least two separate occasions during primate history.