Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Review of survival curves for colorectal cancer
Cameron F E Platell1, James B Semmens
1University Department of Surgery, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia. cplatell@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Purpose:
Actuarial and Product Limited (i.e., Kaplan-Meier) estimates of survival are commonly used in the literature to describe outcomes in patients treated for cancer. Terms such as cancer-specific and cancer-free survival are frequently quoted, although often without clear definitions. This study was designed to compare survival estimates using the Kaplan-Meier method on the same population of patients but using different definitions of what constitutes an event. This was to highlight some of the variation that can occur when different techniques are used to perform these calculations.
Methods:
Data were obtained from a prospective database that had recorded all patients presenting with colorectal cancer from 1996 to 2002. Using this information, we calculated the 1) overall (all-cause mortality), 2) cancer-specific, 3) cancer-free, 4) recurrence-free, and 5) relative survival (and 95 percent confidence intervals) at five years postpresentation.
Results:
The study included 497 patients with a mean age of 68 years, and a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. They were followed for a mean of 2.2 years (standard deviation, +/-1.1), with 50 patients (10.1 percent) followed for more than five years. The various survivals at five years were: 1) overall survival, 55.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 49.1-62.1 percent), 2) cancer-specific survival, 67 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 60.9-73.1 percent), 3) cancer-free survival, 49.9 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 43.6-56.2 percent), 4) recurrence-free survival, 43.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 37.2-49.8 percent), and 5) relative survival, 73.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 65.4-81.4 percent).
Conclusions:
The five-year survival calculations for this group of patients with colorectal cancer varied by as much as 30 percent depending on how the data was censored. This highlights that there needs to be a clear and accountable definition on how survival curves are calculated and presented in the literature to allow for meaningful interpretation and comparisons.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...