Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

08:45
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
Look before you leap
1Ramey Equine, Glendale, California, USA. ponydoc@pacbell.net
The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Practice
|January 22, 2005
Summary
Veterinarians must critically evaluate therapeutic claims, especially for equine health, to ensure treatments are evidence-based. Avoid unproven practices and recognize factors other than the therapy that may cause perceived success.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Equine Therapeutics
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Critical evaluation of therapeutic claims is essential for veterinary practice success.
- Veterinarians must exercise caution with new and unproven practices.
- Understanding confounding factors in perceived therapeutic success is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To emphasize the importance of rigorous scientific evidence in veterinary therapeutics.
- To guide veterinarians in evaluating treatment efficacy.
- To prevent the adoption of ineffective or misguided practices in equine medicine.
Main Methods:
- This study is a review and critical analysis of therapeutic evaluation standards.
- It emphasizes the need for scientific data to support veterinary treatments.
- Discussion focuses on potential biases and confounding variables in outcome assessment.
Main Results:
- Many factors unrelated to the treatment modality can lead to perceived therapeutic success.
- A lack of robust scientific data often surrounds new or unproven veterinary practices.
- Historical veterinary practices were sometimes based on sincerity rather than evidence.
Conclusions:
- Equine veterinarians must rely on rigorous standards of evidence for therapeutic claims.
- Adoption of new therapies should be contingent upon strong scientific validation.
- Prioritizing evidence-based medicine safeguards the veterinary profession and animal welfare.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Persuasion Strategies
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
First Impression
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...

