Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition.

Brian MacWhinney1

  • 1Departmnet of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. macw@cmu.edu

Journal of Child Language
|January 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The collection of speech data for the assessment of cognition remotely: Balancing ethical and practical challenges.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Developmental Sentence Scoring for Preschool Language Sample Analysis: A Psychometric Update.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2026
Same author

Introducing the NEURAL Research Lab Data Set for Studies of Discourse and Gesture in Aphasia and Cognitively Healthy Aging Adults.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Priorities for New Data Collection.

Developmental science·2025
Same author

Mental simulation in bilingual and second language processing: New directions in the Competition Model.

Brain and language·2025
Same author

Six advances in research on bilingualism.

Brain and language·2025
Same journal

Perceptual asymmetries in the development of lexical tone perception in Thai-learning children.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

To bind or not to bind: Individual differences in pronominal processing among adolescent Mandarin-English heritage speakers.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

Influence of Visual Context Stability on Word Learning in Fourteen- and Nineteen-Month-Old Children.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the Acquisition of Conditionals: Children's and Adults' Expression of Hypothetical Thought.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

The effect of distributional information on the categorization of unaccusativity.

Journal of child language·2026
Same journal

Examining the Robustness and Generalizability of the Shape Bias: A Meta-Analysis.

Journal of child language·2026
See all related articles

The logical problem in language acquisition may be solved by positive data, challenging the need for universal grammar constraints. Simple learning procedures explain grammar acquisition without relying solely on innate structures.

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The logical problem in language acquisition posits that input is insufficient for grammar learning.
  • Children often ignore corrective feedback, suggesting reliance on innate universal grammar.
  • Existing theories propose universal grammar constraints to solve this problem.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the logical problem in language acquisition.
  • To demonstrate that positive data is sufficient for learning grammatical structures.
  • To propose alternative learning mechanisms beyond universal grammar.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of child language corpora to identify positive exemplars.
  • Formulation of simple learning procedures using available positive data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of emergentist theory and its implications for language acquisition.
  • Main Results:

    • Claims regarding the absence of positive exemplars in language input are challenged.
    • Simple learning procedures can account for the acquisition of complex syntactic structures.
    • Emergentist theory provides a framework for understanding language development through supportive processes.

    Conclusions:

    • The logical problem may be resolved without invoking innate universal grammar constraints.
    • Positive data and simple learning procedures are sufficient for grammar acquisition.
    • Grammatical competition and processing load explain variations in learning difficulty.