Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Good management. Make boards work better.

Jay Bevington1, Paul Stanton, Phil Glanfield

  • 1Clinical Governance Support Team.

The Health Service Journal
|January 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Biodosimetry Biomarkers for Radiation Dose and Injury Assessment After Mixed-Field (Neutron and Gamma) and Pure Gamma Radiation in the Mouse Total-Body Irradiation Model.

Health physics·2020
Same author

Biomarkers for Radiation Biodosimetry and Injury Assessment after Mixed-field (Neutron and Gamma) Radiation in the Mouse Total-body Irradiation Model.

Health physics·2018
Same author

A model combining age, equivalent uniform dose and IL-8 may predict radiation esophagitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2018
Same author

Prediction of Radiation Esophagitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Clinical Factors, Dosimetric Parameters, and Pretreatment Cytokine Levels.

Translational oncology·2017
Same author

Radiation-induced lung toxicity in non-small-cell lung cancer: Understanding the interactions of clinical factors and cytokines with the dose-toxicity relationship.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2017
Same author

Principal component analysis identifies patterns of cytokine expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy.

PloS one·2017

Performance reviews for trust boards are uncommon but crucial. Balancing executive cohesion and constructive challenge is key to fostering innovation and trust.

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Psychology
  • Corporate Governance

Background:

  • Performance reviews for trust boards are infrequent, despite their significant strategic role.
  • Effective trust boards require strong cohesion between executive and non-executive members.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of trust board performance evaluations.
  • To explore the dynamics of cohesion and challenge within trust boards.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of trust board dynamics.
  • Case studies examining board interactions.

Main Results:

  • Board member cohesion is vital for effective functioning.
  • A balance between trust and constructive challenge is necessary.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Excessive challenge without sufficient trust can stifle innovation.

    • Conclusions:

    • Regular performance reviews are recommended for trust boards.
    • Cultivating a culture of trust alongside constructive dissent is essential for innovation.