Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic imaging update: soft tissue sarcomas.

Edson L Knapp1, Mark J Kransdorf, G Douglas Letson

  • 1East Pasco Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Zephyrhills, FL 33541, USA. eknapp1@tampabay.rr.com

Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
|January 26, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comparison of hemiarthroplasty with aortograft vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty following proximal humeral oncologic resection.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

Imaging features of nodular fasciitis: a review of 89 cases.

Skeletal radiology·2025
Same author

Genomic, transcriptomic, and immunogenomic landscape of over 1300 sarcomas of diverse histology subtypes.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Musculoskeletal glomus tumor: a review of 218 lesions in 176 patients.

Skeletal radiology·2024
Same author

Management of bone disease with concurrent chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma.

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology·2024
Same author

Ankle, knee, and elbow arthrography: 2022 survey of Society of Skeletal Radiology members.

Skeletal radiology·2023

Diagnosing soft tissue sarcomas requires a multimodal imaging approach. Magnetic resonance imaging is preferred for soft tissue tumors, while computed tomography excels in bone evaluation and for patients unable to undergo MRI.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • No single imaging modality is optimal for all tumor types.
  • Radiography aids in diagnosing specific tumors, but often requires supplementary imaging.
  • Soft tissue sarcomas necessitate a comprehensive, multimodality imaging strategy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review general imaging approaches for soft tissue masses.
  • To outline fundamental principles of tumor imaging.
  • To discuss the application of advanced imaging modalities in soft tissue sarcoma evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of general imaging approaches for soft tissue masses.
  • Discussion of fundamental principles in tumor imaging.
  • Exploration of newer imaging modalities and their specific applications.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred modality for soft tissue tumors, though it has limitations in visualizing calcifications.
  • Computed tomography (CT) is optimal for assessing osseous architecture and for patients unsuitable for MRI.
  • Positron emission tomography (PET) aids in metabolic imaging; ultrasonography differentiates cystic from solid masses; MR angiography details vascular supply.

Conclusions:

  • Current noninvasive imaging techniques offer robust methods for diagnosing and staging soft tissue sarcomas.
  • A combination of imaging modalities provides a comprehensive approach to soft tissue sarcoma management.