Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Access-site complications after rescue percutaneous coronary intervention during thrombolysis for acute myocardial
A Germing1, M Lindstaedt, S Ulrich
1Medizinische Klinik II, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany. alfried.germing@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Insights
Emergency coronary interventions after failed thrombolysis are safe, even with aggressive antithrombotic therapy. This study found low rates of access-site bleeding complications in patients undergoing these rescue procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Aggressive antithrombotic therapy can increase access-site complications post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Emergency PCI is often required after failed thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- Assessing safety of PCI in patients on ongoing thrombolysis is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze femoral bleeding complications after emergency PCI in patients with unsuccessful thrombolysis for AMI.
- To evaluate the safety of PCI in patients receiving aggressive antithrombotic regimens.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 76 consecutive patients undergoing emergency PCI within 8 hours of failed thrombolysis.
- Documented all femoral bleeding complications, including hematomas, pseudoaneurysms, and fistulas.
- Recorded use of additional antithrombotic agents like heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Main Results:
- Only 3.9% of patients developed minor femoral hematomas; 1.3% required blood transfusion.
- No cases of pseudoaneurysm, fistula, or surgical vascular intervention were observed.
- PCI procedures demonstrated excellent safety regarding access-site bleeding.
Conclusions:
- Emergency PCI can be safely performed in patients with unsuccessful AMI thrombolysis.
- Aggressive antithrombotic therapy does not significantly increase bleeding risk in these rescue PCI scenarios.
- PCI is a safe and effective option for rescue therapy post-thrombolysis failure.
Abstract:
Aggressive antithrombotic medical therapy may increase the rate of access-site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Frequently, emergency coronary interventions have to be performed in a situation when thrombolysis therapy was administered as the first-line therapeutic approach in acute myocardial infarction but failed to achieve stable conditions. We analyzed the rate of femoral bleeding complications after emergency coronary intervention in 76 consecutive patients with unsuccessful thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. All invasive procedures were performed in a time period no longer than eight hours after thrombolysis was administered. Additional antithrombotic therapy with heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-inhibitors was given during intervention in 100% and 38.2% of patients, respectively. In three patients (3.9%) femoral hematomas without therapeutic consequences were documented; one patient (1.3%) developed a hematoma requiring blood transfusion. A pseudoaneurysm, fistula or surgical vascular intervention did not occur. Coronary interventional procedures in rescue situations can be performed with excellent safety with respect to access-site bleeding complications even under conditions of ongoing thrombolysis therapy and aggressive antithrombotic medical regimens.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
