Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Data mining and knowledge discovery in predictive toxicology.

C Helma1

  • 1Institute of Computer Science, Georges Kohler Allee 79, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany. helma@informatik.uni-freiburg.de

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
|January 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction of adverse drug reactions using decision tree modeling.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2010
Same author

Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.

Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews·2009
Same author

Prediction of chemical toxicity with local support vector regression and activity-specific kernels.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2008
Same author

Validation of counter propagation neural network models for predictive toxicology according to the OECD principles: a case study.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2006
Same author

A survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Fragment generation and support vector machines for inducing SARs.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2002
Same journal

Mapping toxicity pathways of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using interpretable classification-based machine learning models.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Structure-based identification of inhibitory compounds targeting M32 metallocarboxypeptidase of <i>Leishmania donovani</i>.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Multiscale computational evaluation of marine fungal metabolites containing iminohydantoin-like scaffolds as anti-Alzheimer drug candidates.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Conformational landscapes and binding free energies of multitarget phytochemicals reveal molecular recognition mechanisms in colorectal cancer-associated proteins.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

AI-driven QSAR modelling and virtual screening in the discovery of selective dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor ligands.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Integrating machine learning and pharmacogenomics for biomarker discovery, identification and prioritization of potential drug candidates in ovarian cancer.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
See all related articles

This study outlines the knowledge discovery process for predictive toxicology, detailing five key steps and the role of data mining. It reviews algorithms for each step, including a specific implementation of the LAZAR prediction system.

Area of Science:

  • Computational toxicology
  • Data mining
  • Cheminformatics

Background:

  • Predictive toxicology is crucial for assessing chemical safety.
  • The knowledge discovery process (KDP) provides a framework for building predictive models.
  • Data mining techniques are integral to various stages of the KDP.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the knowledge discovery process in predictive toxicology.
  • To review data mining algorithms applicable to each step of the KDP.
  • To present a specific implementation of the LAZAR prediction system.

Main Methods:

  • Feature calculation
  • Feature selection
  • Model induction
  • Model validation

Related Experiment Videos

  • Interpretation of predictions and models
  • Review of data mining algorithms

    • Main Results:

    • The KDP in predictive toxicology involves five distinct steps.
    • Data mining algorithms can be applied across all KDP steps.
    • The LAZAR prediction system serves as a practical example of KDP implementation.

    Conclusions:

    • A systematic approach to knowledge discovery enhances predictive toxicology model development.
    • Understanding and applying appropriate data mining techniques are essential for successful predictive toxicology.
    • The described process and system facilitate robust prediction and interpretation in toxicology.