Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Support for polygenic influences on ocular refractive error.

Alison P Klein1, Priya Duggal, Kristine E Lee

  • 1Statistical Genetics Section, Inherited Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|January 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Polygenic scores for risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evaluation of novel and published models.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Pancreatic cancer.

Nature reviews. Disease primers·2026
Same author

Novel Genetic Risk Loci for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Identified in a Genome-wide Study of African Ancestry Individuals.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Integrative screening identifies functional variants and VNTRs underlying GWAS signals at the 5p15.33 multi-cancer susceptibility locus.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Different diabetes types and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a Mendelian randomization and pathway/gene-set analysis.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2025
Same author

Genome-wide association analysis identifies fucosyltransferase 2 variants associated with pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Cancer·2025
Same journal

Impact of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits on Ellipsoid Zone-Related Thickness Metrics.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Optic Nerves From SMOX-Deficient Mice Identifies Regulators of Neuroinflammation and Axonal Damage in Optic Neuritis.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Aflibercept and Faricimab Equipotently Restore Endothelial Barrier Function.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Spatial Decomposition of Longitudinal RNFL Maps Reveals Distinct Modes of Glaucomatous Progression With Structure-Function and Genetic Signatures.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

The CXXC1-IGFBP6 Axis Maintains Corneal Epithelial Differentiation via H3K4me3-Dependent Transcriptional Activation.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Archetypal Visual Field Analysis of Patients With Chronic Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy in Relation to Visual Recovery.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Genetic factors significantly influence refractive errors like myopia and hyperopia. This study suggests multiple genes of modest effect, possibly interacting with environmental factors, contribute to these common vision conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Human Genetics
  • Population Health

Background:

  • Refractive errors, including myopia and hyperopia, are prevalent conditions necessitating corrective lenses.
  • The familial aggregation of myopia is a well-documented phenomenon.
  • Previous research has identified several chromosomal regions associated with high myopia, quantitative refraction, and moderate myopia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the familial aggregation and inheritance patterns of ocular refraction in an adult population.
  • To analyze refractive error data from the Beaver Dam Eye Study to understand genetic and environmental influences.

Main Methods:

  • Examined familial correlations and performed segregation analysis on average refractive error measurements.
  • Adjusted analyses for age, sex, and education.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized data from 2138 individuals across 620 extended pedigrees.

    • Main Results:

    • Found significant positive correlations between siblings (0.33), parents and offspring (0.17), and cousins (0.10).
    • Segregation analysis did not support a single major gene influencing refractive error across the entire spectrum.
    • Models incorporating polygenic effects provided a better fit, indicating multiple genes with modest effects contribute to refractive error.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the role of genetic factors in the development of refractive error.
    • These results align with previous reports linking multiple genomic regions to refractive error susceptibility.