Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating risks of perinatal death.

Gordon C S Smith1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK. gcss2@cam.ac.uk

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|January 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elective Cesarean Section for Maternal Preference.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Mendelian Randomization With Longitudinal Exposure Data: Simulation Study and Real Data Application.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Polygenic Risk Scores for Preeclampsia Prediction Beyond Gold-Standard Clinical Models in Multiethnic Populations.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2025
Same author

How Should We Communicate Information Regarding Birth Choices to Women?: An Online Randomised Survey.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2025
Same author

Raised Leptin and Pappalysin2 cell-free RNAs are the hallmarks of pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The human placenta and its role in reproductive outcomes revisited.

Physiological reviews·2025
Same journal

Early patient removal of urinary catheters after urogynecologic surgery, a randomized trial.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Standard vs. Lower Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Association of Surgical Approach with Oncologic Outcomes in Low-Risk Cervical Cancer.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Trends in Infertility Treatments by Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Region in U.S. Birth Certificates from Live Births: 2011-2022.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Likelihood ratios enhance clinical interpretation of metagenomic prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in preterm premature rupture of membranes (Letter-to-the-Editor).

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Taking risk stratification in preterm premature rupture of membranes to the bedside (Reply to Letter-to-the-Editor).

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Estimating perinatal death risk from observational studies requires careful statistical methods. This review highlights critical factors for accurate risk assessment in obstetric counseling to improve patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Perinatal medicine
  • Biostatistics
  • Obstetrics

Background:

  • Observational studies are frequently used to estimate perinatal death risks for obstetric intervention counseling.
  • The statistical validity of these risk estimates is critical, yet many existing studies suffer from significant flaws.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review and address key aspects of estimating the risk of perinatal death from observational data.
  • To identify crucial factors for improving the accuracy and reliability of perinatal mortality risk assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Review of methodological approaches to estimating perinatal death risk.
  • Analysis of critical factors including cause of death definition, antepartum vs. intrapartum event differentiation, and denominator selection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of cumulative risk assessment, appropriate statistical tests, and stratification by gestational age for delivery-related deaths.
  • Consideration of specific challenges in multiple pregnancies, such as timing of stillbirth and paired statistical tests for twin pairs.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified several key factors influencing the accuracy of perinatal death risk estimation.
    • Highlighted the need for precise definitions, appropriate statistical denominators, and correct timing of events.
    • Emphasized the importance of stratification for delivery-related deaths and specialized methods for multiple pregnancies.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate estimation of perinatal death risk is essential for effective obstetric counseling.
    • Addressing the identified methodological flaws in observational studies is crucial for reliable risk assessment.
    • Improved statistical approaches, particularly for complex cases like multiple pregnancies, are needed to enhance clinical decision-making.