Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
Published on: August 22, 2013
Similarities and effectiveness of test environments in selecting and deploying desirable genotypes
1Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya, Turkey. kani@akdeniz.edu.tr
Abstract:
Rooted cuttings of 40 different clones (genotypes) of Picea abies (L.) Karst were planted in seven test environments (P, H, L, S, B, M and K) in northern Germany. Type-B genetic correlations between the pairs of test sites were estimated, and a cluster diagram based on inter-site genetic correlations for height was used to illustrate the general pattern of similarities among the test sites. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the first three principal components explained 97% of the variance in height, thereby providing a good summary of the relationships among the test sites. Test sites B and K accounted for a relatively high-and test sites H and M for a relatively low-proportion of genotype-environment interaction sums of squares and, consequently, for "ecovalence". "Moderator" and "instigator" test sites for interactions in different site combinations were detected. On the basis of several similarity measures, we observed two distinct groups: sites M-S-P formed one group, while sites K-L formed the other; sites H and B were closer to the first group. The empirical data indicated that a good test site should have the following features: (1) low interaction behaviour, (2) low coefficient of variation, (3) high genotypic selectivity, (4) high coefficient of determination, (5) high efficiency of expected gain. Based on these criteria, site M was determined to be the best test site for screening genotypes to be planted in other environments. We concluded that one broadly adapted vegetative propagation population of P. abies can be used for the potential planting environments in northern Germany.
More Related Videos
10:08Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
Published on: August 12, 2019
15:30A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
Published on: August 5, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Test Cross
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Test Cross
Gene-Environment Interactions
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...