Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phasic skin conductance activity and motion sickness.

J F Golding1

  • 1Royal Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine, Farnborough, Hants, United Kingdom.

Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Forehead skin conductance responses best indicate motion sickness onset and recovery. This study compared recording sites and signal analysis methods to improve motion sickness detection. Other methods were less effective.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors influencing clinical outcome in vestibular neuritis - A focussed review and reanalysis of prospective data.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2023
Same author

Visual Vertigo, Motion Sickness, and Disorientation in Vehicles.

Seminars in neurology·2020
Same author

Motion sickness.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2016
Same author

Effects of prochlorperazine on normal vestibular ocular and perceptual responses: a randomised, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2014
Same author

Motion sickness susceptibility in healthy subjects and vestibular patients: effects of gender, age and trait-anxiety.

Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·2013
Same author

Time-course of effects of oral cinnarizine and hyoscine on task performance.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human Physiology
  • Vestibular Science

Background:

  • Sweating is a common symptom associated with motion sickness.
  • Previous research explored the link between electrodermal activity and motion sickness severity.
  • Methodological improvements are needed for accurate assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare different recording sites (palmar finger vs. forehead) for sweat response measurement.
  • To evaluate signal analysis techniques (tonic skin conductance level vs. phasic skin conductance responses).
  • To identify the optimal method for correlating physiological responses with motion sickness.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects experienced a cross-coupled motion challenge with escalating rotational velocity.
  • Control conditions included rotation only and head movements only.
  • Sweating was measured via mass spectrometry for water vapor in a subset of participants.

Main Results:

  • Phasic skin conductance responses recorded at the forehead were the most effective correlate of motion sickness onset and recovery.
  • Palmar finger recordings and tonic skin conductance level analysis were less informative.
  • Different motion challenges (rotational, linear) were employed to induce symptoms.

Conclusions:

  • Forehead phasic skin conductance activity offers a superior method for monitoring motion sickness.
  • This finding aids in developing more sensitive and reliable diagnostic tools for motion sickness.

Related Experiment Videos