Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Experimental Endocarditis Model of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Rat
Published on: June 4, 2012
Activity of glycopeptides against Staphylococcus aureus infection in a rabbit endocarditis model: MICs do not predict
Nathalie Asseray1, Cedric Jacqueline, Virginie Le Mabecque
1Laboratoire Antibiologie, UPRES EA 3826, Faculté de Médecine, 1 rue Gaston Veil, 44035 Nantes, France.
Abstract:
The in vivo efficacy of vancomycin and teicoplanin against five Staphylococcus aureus strains with different susceptibilities to them and methicillin was studied. Rabbits were allocated at random to groups for endocarditis induction with one of these five strains and then treated for 2 days with vancomycin or teicoplanin. Each treated group was compared with a control group infected with the same strain. Vancomycin and teicoplanin showed similar activities. Low MICs did not predict better in vivo results.
Insights
Vancomycin and teicoplanin demonstrated comparable efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rabbits. Low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in vitro did not reliably predict treatment success in vivo.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Staphylococcus aureus is a significant pathogen causing serious infections.
- Antibiotic resistance in S. aureus is a growing concern.
- Vancomycin and teicoplanin are key glycopeptide antibiotics used to treat S. aureus infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of vancomycin and teicoplanin.
- To compare their effectiveness against Staphylococcus aureus strains with varying susceptibilities.
- To determine if in vitro susceptibility predicts in vivo outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Endocarditis was induced in rabbits using five different S. aureus strains.
- Animals were treated for 2 days with either vancomycin or teicoplanin.
- Treatment groups were compared to untreated control groups infected with the same strains.
Main Results:
- Vancomycin and teicoplanin exhibited similar in vivo efficacy against the tested S. aureus strains.
- The in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) did not correlate with in vivo treatment effectiveness.
- Both antibiotics showed comparable activity regardless of methicillin susceptibility.
Conclusions:
- Vancomycin and teicoplanin are similarly effective in treating S. aureus endocarditis in a rabbit model.
- In vitro susceptibility testing (MICs) may not be a sufficient predictor of in vivo treatment response for these antibiotics.
- Further research is needed to understand factors influencing glycopeptide efficacy in vivo.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
