Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Wound drainage for caesarean section.

S Gates1, E R Anderson

  • 1National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF. simon.gates@perinat.ox.ac.uk

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|January 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in cats and dogs from households in Italy.

Nature communications·2020
Same author

Evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in cats and dogs from households in Italy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2020
Same author

Trial sequential analysis: useful or useless?

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2020
Same author

Association of a P2RX7 gene missense variant with brachycephalic dog breeds.

Animal genetics·2019
Same author

Correlation between neonatal outcomes of twins depends on the outcome: secondary analysis of twelve randomised controlled trials.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2018
Same author

Post-admission outcomes of participants in the PARAMEDIC trial: A cluster randomised trial of mechanical or manual chest compressions.

Resuscitation·2017
Same journal

Interventions to prevent or cease electronic cigarette use in children and adolescents.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Drugs to improve anaemia, quality of life, and physical function in people with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Interventions for smoking cessation in inpatient psychiatry settings.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Mechanical thromboprophylaxis for preventing intradialytic hypotension in people undergoing maintenance haemodialysis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Prognostic models for predicting intensive care unit admission or mortality in critically ill adults not yet been admitted to the intensive care unit.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Views and experiences of weight management for people living with mobility‑limiting conditions, intellectual disabilities or severe mental illness: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
See all related articles

Routine wound drains after caesarean section show no benefit for maternal health or reducing infection. Not using drains may slightly shorten surgery and reduce blood loss in caesarean procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Surgical Site Management
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Wound drains are sometimes used after caesarean sections, with varying clinical indications.
  • The decision to use drains is often clinician-dependent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of wound drains versus no drains at caesarean section.
  • To evaluate different types of wound drains on maternal health and healthcare resource use.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted.
  • Searches included major electronic databases up to June 2004.
  • Seven trials involving 1993 women were included and assessed for quality.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • No significant difference in wound infection, other complications, febrile morbidity, or endometritis between drain and no-drain groups.
  • Potential for slightly shorter operative time (approx. 5 minutes) and reduced blood loss when drains are omitted.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence from small trials does not support routine wound drain use in caesarean sections.
  • Further large, blinded trials are needed to investigate drain efficacy, especially in specific patient groups (e.g., obese, repeat caesareans).
  • The role of drains when haemostasis is uncertain and patient experiences require further study.