Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequencing the elements in references.

J Hartley1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Keele, Canada.

Applied Ergonomics
|March 1, 1981
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study challenges Brian Shackel's claims about referencing systems in Applied Ergonomics. Evidence presented supports the original conclusions, contradicting Shackel's proposed advantages for the referencing system.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Late-Onset Graft Failure in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Implications of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure on Retransplantation Outcomes.

Pediatric transplantation·2025
Same author

"I'll meet you at our bench": adaptation, innovation and resilience among VCSE organisations who supported marginalised and minoritised communities during the Covid-19 pandemic in Northern England - a qualitative focus group study.

BMC health services research·2024
Same author

Deregulation and epigenetic modification of BCL2-family genes cause resistance to venetoclax in hematologic malignancies.

Blood·2022
Same author

Sustainable surgery: in and out of the operating theatre.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

A systematic review of risk of HIV transmission through biting or spitting: implications for policy.

HIV medicine·2018
Same author

The adaptation and translation of the PEACH™ RCT intervention: the process and outcomes of the PEACH™ in the community trial.

Public health·2017
Same journal

Authority gradients in rail: A cross-jurisdictional systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The distracting role of stress: Impaired executive attention and delayed fatigue perception.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of work system components in interprofessional communication to determine shock etiology.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Getting SSPOT to run: Development of a novel direct observational tool for usage in clinical settings.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the impact of sopite syndrome on physiological responses during an immersive Augmented Reality (AR) game in a moving vehicle.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The effect of aircraft cockpit rudder pedal shape on lower limb muscle activation, plantar pressure, and comfort.

Applied ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics
  • Scientific Publishing
  • Bibliometrics

Background:

  • A previous article in this journal discussed referencing systems.
  • Brian Shackel proposed advantages for the referencing system used in Applied Ergonomics.
  • These proposed advantages were not considered in the original article.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the claims made by Brian Shackel regarding the referencing system in Applied Ergonomics.
  • To present evidence contrary to Shackel's views.
  • To support the original conclusions of the earlier article.

Main Methods:

  • Review of referencing practices in Applied Ergonomics.
  • Analysis of evidence presented by Brian Shackel.
  • Comparative analysis of referencing system advantages.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence was found to be contrary to Brian Shackel's assertions.
  • The findings support the original conclusions of the earlier article.
  • The proposed advantages of the referencing system were not substantiated.

Conclusions:

  • Brian Shackel's arguments regarding the referencing system in Applied Ergonomics are not supported by the presented evidence.
  • The original conclusions regarding the referencing system remain valid.
  • Further investigation into referencing system efficacy in scientific journals is warranted.