Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biases in quantitative judgements.

E C Poulton1

  • 1Medical Research Council, Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge.

Applied Ergonomics
|March 1, 1982
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study details cognitive biases in quantitative judgment, explaining their origins and offering strategies to mitigate them. While some biases can be avoided, complete elimination is not feasible.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Monitoring up to 16 Synthetic Television Pictures Showing a Great Deal of Movement.

Ergonomics·2017
Same author

The journal of motor behavior in the 1960s and the 1980s.

Journal of motor behavior·1988
Same author

Why unbiased numerical magnitude judgments of the loudness of noise are linear in decibels: a rejoinder to the Teghtsoonians.

Perception & psychophysics·1986
Same author

Geometric illusions in reading graphs.

Perception & psychophysics·1985
Same author

Subjective zeros, subjectively equal stimulus spacing, and contraction biases in very first judgments of lightness.

Perception & psychophysics·1985
Same author

A linear relation between loudness and decibels.

Perception & psychophysics·1984
Same journal

Advancing safety training for nuclear decommissioning and dismantling: Integrating MX-based approaches for improved competency development.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Authority gradients in rail: A cross-jurisdictional systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The distracting role of stress: Impaired executive attention and delayed fatigue perception.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of work system components in interprofessional communication to determine shock etiology.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Getting SSPOT to run: Development of a novel direct observational tool for usage in clinical settings.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the impact of sopite syndrome on physiological responses during an immersive Augmented Reality (AR) game in a moving vehicle.

Applied ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Quantitative Analysis

Background:

  • Quantitative judgments are fundamental in scientific and everyday decision-making.
  • Cognitive biases can systematically distort these judgments, leading to inaccurate conclusions.
  • Understanding these biases is crucial for improving the reliability of assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate common biases in quantitative judgment.
  • To describe the underlying mechanisms that generate these biases.
  • To propose methods for avoiding or reducing the impact of these biases.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of cognitive processes.
  • Description of common judgmental heuristics and biases.
  • Review of strategies for bias mitigation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified and described key biases affecting quantitative estimations.
  • Explained the psychological mechanisms driving these biases, such as anchoring and availability.
  • Provided practical recommendations for improving judgment accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive biases are inherent in quantitative judgment.
  • Awareness and specific strategies can reduce, but not eliminate, bias.
  • Continuous effort is needed to minimize bias in critical decision-making.