Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sex differences in strength - some observations on their variability.

S T Pheasant1

  • 1Biomechanics Laboratory, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.

Applied Ergonomics
|September 1, 1983
PubMed
Summary

Sex differences in strength vary significantly based on the specific task and population. Grip strength tests showed greater sex differences with larger handle sizes, emphasizing the need for empirical data in design.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does RSI exist?

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·1992
Same author

Human strength capabilities during one-handed maximum voluntary exertions in the fore and aft plane.

Ergonomics·1991
Same author

An integrated approach to the study of posture in keyboard operation.

Applied ergonomics·1984
Same author

A technique for estimating anthropometric data from the parameters of the distribution of stature.

Ergonomics·1982
Same author

Anthropometric estimates for British civilian adults.

Ergonomics·1982
Same author

Vector representations of human strength in whole body exertion.

Applied ergonomics·1982

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Published literature reveals 112 datasets comparing male and female strength.
  • Previous research indicates variability in sex differences across different tasks and populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify sex differences in strength across various tasks.
  • To investigate the influence of equipment design, specifically handle size, on strength-related sex differences.
  • To provide empirical data for designers to avoid assumptions about sex-based strength variations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 112 existing datasets using three indices: female to male mean strength ratio (F/M), proportion of variance due to sex (R(2)), and percentage of chance encounters where females are stronger (%CEFS).
  • Experimental study involving male and female subjects performing isometric grip and turn tasks with cylindrical handles of varying diameters (10, 30, 50, 70 mm).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of whole-body exertion data from Pheasant et al. (1982).

    • Main Results:

    • Sex differences in strength are highly variable and specific to the task and population studied.
    • Strength-related sex differences increased with larger handle diameters in the grip and turn experiment.
    • An optimal handle size of 50 mm was identified for both male and female subjects.
    • Similar strength tests can yield markedly different levels of sex difference.

    Conclusions:

    • Designers should not generalize or assume sex differences in strength for specific actions.
    • Empirical investigation is crucial for understanding and accommodating sex-specific strength capabilities in task and equipment design.
    • Variability in strength measures necessitates task-specific, data-driven design approaches.