Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum acceptable lifting loads during seated and standing work positions.

J W Yates1, W Karwowski

  • 1Exercise Physiology Laboratory, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.

Applied Ergonomics
|September 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary

Lifting frequency significantly impacts maximal acceptable load, with higher frequencies reducing the weight individuals can comfortably lift. Standing lifts allow for greater acceptable loads compared to seated lifts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of ultrasonic irradiation upon the phase transition in the formation of colloidal sulfur.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010
Same author

The work compatibility improvement framework: preliminary findings of a case study for defining and measuring the human-at-work system.

Ergonomics·2007
Same author

Biomechanical evaluation of nursing tasks in a hospital setting.

Ergonomics·2007
Same author

Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems.

Ergonomics·2005
Same author

Musculoskeletal outcomes in multiple body regions and work effects among nurses: the effects of stressful and stimulating working conditions.

Ergonomics·2003
Same author

Comorbidity considerations in geriatric oncology research.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2002

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics
  • Occupational Health
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Determining safe lifting loads is crucial for preventing musculoskeletal injuries in the workplace.
  • Understanding the influence of lifting frequency and posture on maximal acceptable load is essential for ergonomic guidelines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of lifting frequency and posture on the maximal acceptable load (MAL) using the psychophysical method.
  • To quantify the reduction in MAL with increased lifting rates and compare standing versus seated lifting positions.

Main Methods:

  • Eight males performed four types of lifts (seated symmetrical, seated with twist, standing symmetrical, standing vertical) at two frequencies (1 and 4 lifts/min).
  • Subjects self-selected their maximal acceptable load over a 45-minute period.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Physiological measures including heart rate and oxygen consumption, along with perceived exertion, were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Increased lifting frequency from 1 to 4 lifts/min significantly decreased the MAL by 1.6 to 2.1 kg.
    • Standing lifting positions allowed for a 16% greater MAL on average compared to seated positions.
    • Oxygen consumption and heart rate were significantly higher at the higher lifting frequency, but perceived exertion did not differ.

    Conclusions:

    • Lifting frequency and posture are significant determinants of the maximal acceptable load.
    • Reducing lifting frequency and optimizing posture (favoring standing) can increase the acceptable load, potentially improving work efficiency and safety.